in chess, it's well known that a rook is worth more than a bishop (typically, the rook is considered to be worth 5 pawns, the bishop 3)......however, in this game I had triple connected passed pawns, and decided to "lose the exchange" of rook for bishop in order to get some of my opponent's power off the board as the endgame commenced.....
computer analysis later showed this as not the optimal move, in its "opinion"....the computer looks for the BEST move to maximize score, and doesn't lose the exchange unless the result is tactical...people are sometimes better at strategy, and seeing the "big picture"....often it makes more sense when playing a human to get 'er done by simplifying.....
triple passes pawns can be very powerful, and they more than made up for the exchange of a rook for bishop.... this enabled the pawns to march up the board with less resistance....also, I had these valuable pawns remaining due to outplaying my opponent a bit in the middlegame, and plinking off a few here and there, creating the imbalance....
the outcome was inevitable, so my opponent resigned when it was mate in 1.....
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.