You have laid out some pretty serious accusations against someone including criminal violations. Do you have any basis for alleging for example losing a law license and criminal violations?
In the war of words between the two parties in which "there is no love loss" [sic] we have one party, Hand, saying that
Bukstel was mad that Hand uncovered his misdeeds and so Bukstel locked up the shares he thought Hand controlled, and then Bukstel controlled the float and ran a pump and dump scheme, running the stock up to $.41, by employing false press releases,
vs.
Bukstel claiming that he uncovered a pump and dump scheme by Hand, and as a result took appropriate action. You said in an earlier post that when you called Bukstel he threatened to report you to every 3 letter agency, so, he must have reported Hand to the SEC.
So far, the SEC has believed Hand's version of events and imposed the stop trade. The SEC started an investigation over a year ago against VitaminSpice and Bukstel. Yet no investigation of Hand is apparently going on. Are you saying that the SEC is in Hand's pocket?
yes the judge let VitaminSpice's counterclaim go through, and denied the summary judgment motion. All that means is that the judge thought the counterclaim, IF THE FACTS STATED THEREIN WERE TRUE, has a chance, yes a chance of succeeding, and VitaminSpice should have the chance to do so. If you read the counterclaim yourself, you will see that proving them is going to be extremely difficult and document intensive. And expensive in the several hundreds of thousands range. Where is Ed going to get the money to carry this out?
Also I would like to point out that the bankruptcy court reversed itself and VitaminSpice is again in bankruptcy, and will stay there unless they make a good argument by March 18, (next Monday) when their answer is due. the argument that VitaminSpice has to make, to exit bankruptcy, is to to show that it is, in fact, paying its debts as they come due. Since VitaminSpice has not had any cash for almost two years, how are they going to show that they have been timely paying its debts? Their "high powered" legal team resigned from the bankruptcy case for nonpayment and so far Ed has not hired new legal counsel. It frankly looks like a lost cause. So, it appears that the bankruptcy attempt has been "successful."
One thing I do not understand when you talk about the "real" shareholders" of VitaminSpice who Ed claims to represent: the ones who got hundreds of millions of shares for "consulting fees" and "services" on Ed's watch, versus the shareholders whom Ed blocked who put over a half million dollars of cash money in the company. Which do you think are "real" shareholders?
