Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > The Lounge > Politics > The American Dream

The Welfare Spending Chart You Won’t Want to See

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
EarlyOne Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 41
Posts 10,894
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/28/05
160x600 placeholder
U.S. Stocks Skid; Manufacturing Slows Down
U.S. stock investors continued their selling ways this week, pushing prices lower in early trading. Wednesday's slide stemmed from upbeat employment and manufacturing data for September, which although points to positive momentum for the U.S. economy, continued to fuel worries that the Federal Reserve may raise interest rates sooner than later.
Top Equities Stories Of The Day
JAL Customer Data Target of Cyber Attack
IPO Scorecard: Update on Selected Initial Stock Offerings
J.P. Morgan Expects $869 Million Credit for Mortgage Actions
Intel Invests in Chinese Chip Maker -- Update
Bank Branches in U.S. Decline to Lowest Level Since 2005
Private Payrolls Increased by 213,000 Jobs in September
Starboard Pushes For Potential Yahoo-AOL Tie-Up -- 5th Update
Correction to Dow Index Overseers Correction
EarlyOne Member Level  Saturday, 12/08/12 04:29:26 PM
Re: None
Post # of 13372 
The Welfare Spending Chart You Won’t Want to See
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 11:00pm by Becket Adams

Today’s depressing chart is brought to you by the Senate Budget Committee Republican staff under Ranking Member Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.):



Yep. As the chart clearly illustrates, total welfare spending in the U.S. (if converted into cash payments) equals approximately “$168 per day for every household in poverty,” higher than the $137 median income per-day.

From the senator’s office:
Quote:
… spending on federal welfare benefits, if converted into cash payments, equals enough to provide $30.60 per hour, 40 hours per week, to each household living below poverty. The median household hourly wage is $25.03. After accounting for federal taxes, the median hourly wage drops to between $21.50 and $23.45, depending on a household’s deductions and filing status. State and local taxes further reduce the median household’s hourly earnings. By contrast, welfare benefits are not taxed.

The universe of means-tested welfare spending refers to programs that provide low-income assistance in the form of direct or indirect financial support—such as food stamps, free housing, child care, etc.—and which the recipient does not pay into (in contrast to Medicare or Social Security). For fiscal year 2011, CRS identified roughly 80 overlapping federal means-tested welfare programs that together represented the single largest budget item in 2011—more than the nation spends on Social Security, Medicare, or national defense. The total amount spent on these federal programs, when taken together with approximately $280 billion in state contributions, amounted to roughly $1 trillion. Nearly 95 percent of these costs come from four categories of spending: medical assistance, cash assistance, food assistance, and social/housing assistance. Under the President’s FY13 budget proposal, means-tested spending would increase an additional 30 percent over the next four years.
The diffuse and overlapping nature of federal welfare spending has led to some confusion regarding the scope and nature of benefits. For instance, Newark Mayor Cory Booker has recently received a great deal of attention for adopting the “food stamp diet” in which he spends only $4 a day on food (the average individual benefit in his state) to apparently illustrate the insufficiency of food stamp spending ($80 billion a year) or the impossibility of reductions. The situation Booker presents, however, is not accurate: a low-income individual on food stamps may qualify for $25,000 in various forms of welfare support from the federal government on top of his or her existing income and resources—including access to 15 different food assistance programs. Further, even if one unrealistically assumes that no other welfare benefits are available, the size of the food stamp benefit increases as one’s income decreases, as the benefit is designed as a supplement to existing resources; it is explicitly not intended to be the sole source of funds for purchasing food.


Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist