InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 19852
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/26/2003

Re: hookrider post# 193783

Sunday, 11/18/2012 3:40:30 PM

Sunday, November 18, 2012 3:40:30 PM

Post# of 495302
"By dropping the Bomb on Japan yes I am proud ole Give em Harry had the guts. He saved untold number of lives. Japan would have fault till the bitter end and still lost. "

Must disagree. Japan was suing for peace before the first bomb.

As a result of the naked futility of their position, the Japanese had approached the Russians, seeking their help in brokering a peace to end the War. The U.S. had long before broken the Japanese codes and knew that these negotiations were under way, knew that the Japanese had for months been trying to find a way to surrender.

Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, reflected this reality when he wrote, "The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace.the atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan." Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman, said the same thing: "The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0806-25.htm

The weapons were far more likely employed to intimidate Stalin as argued by Alperovitz and others.

If large civilian populations are legitimate targets of war will you feel that way if any of the various indigenous groups we're currently abusing manage to get a nuke into New York? Was the World Trade Center really off limits? Why or why not?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.