InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 87
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/06/2012

Re: sluicer post# 19268

Friday, 11/09/2012 11:57:17 AM

Friday, November 09, 2012 11:57:17 AM

Post# of 68424
There are many, many angel investor's that would like to get a piece of the search engine pie. They also having the backing of a billionaire if I'm not correct.

And litigation trials take years, which with all the lawsuits VRNG will be pursuing I'm sure will create enough liquid capital to pay for litigation expenses, and make the company money.

But when you think of it in terms of the overall picture, creating a search engine that could capture even 1%-2% of the market annually, as well as growing 1%-2% would net the company more than all those litigation wins combined.


If I remember back, watching shark tank, I can remember Mark Cuban stating he does not invest in start-ups or company's that can not make his initial investment at least 20x what he puts in. I believe this is a rule most investor's follow as well. I just don't see that with patent litigation, where they could WIN and LOSE cases just the same.

Creating a search engine on the other hand, could very well make him 20x his initial investment, if not 100x more.

The big thing to think about is this. Would you rather get $2 billion now, or $20 billion over the next 10 years?