InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5213
Posts 24106
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: janice shell post# 45474

Tuesday, 10/23/2012 9:56:23 PM

Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:56:23 PM

Post# of 167964
janice shell, with these thoughts...

I think you know the answers to these thoughts. Yes, I do believe that thousands of stocks have been naked shorted. Don't believe me, go to the FINRA and SEC data that I previously posted and it is all there.

Let me better elaborate on an earlier comment. Generally, only fully reporting companies are the only ones allowed to be placed on the Reg SHO List. However, there are some few exceptions. If a non-reporting pink sheet stock somehow creates an interface with the SEC or FINRA from behind the scenes from some kind of a corporate action, equity action, etc., then its share structure would be captured with the Reg SHO database through SEC/FINRA interface and would qualify to be on the list, but for different justifications. This is why you will see a select few non-reporting pink sheet stocks on the Reg SHO list versus all of them that show up for being naked shorted within the SEC and FINRA database.

Again, as I had stated before... it's ok to agree to disagree.

v/r
Sterling