I agree - here's what I posted yesterday:
Treaty can solve all of this very easily - they can be much more transparent with each set of projects they currently have. To do this, all Mike Mulshine would have to do is post a table on thier Facebook page with the following columns and update it weekly (or even every two weeks):
Well Name (Col 1) Current Production (BOPD) (Col 2) Type (rework or new) (Col 3) Production after Rework or Completion for new wells (BOPD) (Col 4) Date for Rework Completion or Completion of new wells (Col 5) Misc. Information (Col 6)
With this one table we would all have a very good idea of where Treaty is currently at and where they are projecting to be at at any time in the future. This would take Treaty all of about 10 minutes to put together.
But instead you get dribbs and drabbs from Mike Mulshine whom everybody claims walks on water - I don't see it. They could very easily clear this all up but choose not to.
Somebody whom regularly talks with Mike M should suggest it - let's see just how good this guy really is.