InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 113
Posts 9592
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/05/2007

Re: space1230 post# 20094

Wednesday, 05/02/2012 3:21:21 AM

Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:21:21 AM

Post# of 22918
Unless we want to go the silly Wells Notice route. I'd find it hysterical for finra to green light the change and then an SEC Wells notice to follow. lol.

Like I've said many times. How would a name/ticker CUSIP change effect any current SEC investigation? It doesn't. And since the SEC would not want to tip their hat as to any possible pending actions, "approving" the changes as you call it really has no bearing on anything at all now does it?

The most important thing here is transparency which this company still has none. Where are financials after 11 months? You do know companies file them quarterly right? So, even in the absence of "previous" financials this company could be supplying reports for current periods. They could also provide corporate details/disclosures but they don't do that either.

Seriously, your arguements completely show their lack of addressing the "sole" reason you believe they were suspended for. How has PIPI addressed the issue you seem to believe is the reason behind their suspension? You downplay the suspension yet you do not address their inability to address the issues that got them suspended in the first place which is a total lack of professionalism on the part of management. How will they become profitable miners when after 11 months they can't clear up a simple regulatory issue Space?