Frankie,
Would you agree with this...
A "hired talking head" that has been the sole "hired talking head" for not only this company but for at least 4 others that can easily be found via Google with the same CEO involved for well over a decade; would you say that "hired talking head" should have a very good idea of exactly what was going on with the company? Now take the fact that this "hired talking head" was also a friend of the CEO, again check Google, taking trips to Europe together, etc.
So when that "hired talking head" innocently passed along those dozen or so stories about things like gold being actively mined, processed shipped and sold from Hockey Stick (which the CEO later admitted on the official web site was a project they never even got involved in, more or less when through the year long process of mining gold from), the LOI that was signed by a company that has never even heard of JRB, the $12M financing that was later proven to be cut and pasted word for word from another company's press release, etc. etc., dont you think there may be some willful culpability involved on that "hired talking head's" part?
If we can agree on that, than I shouldn't need to point out that culpability is legal liability just as much as the original perpetrator.
On the other hand, if that "hired talking head" was truly innocent and never picked up on the blatant fraud from his good friend of over a decade, than can it not honestly and sincerely be said that he must be one of the dumbest individuals on the planet? Any this is who people are happy to have running the show?
Either way, he is either a repeat offender fraudster (original one documented) or a moron. Either way - CONGRATS FOLKS!
