**********
It can't be negated Broadvision's longevity of success in a highly competitive technology based field.
************
What are you smoking? They've had 11 years of successively declining revenue. They have been posting losses. All of the fundamentals indicate this company is in bad shape and barely surviving.
*************
Looks like they swung from their heels and hit a homerun with ClearVale and its cloud computing social platform.
***************
Huh? Perhaps you should read the actual SEC filings rather than listen to pumpers like Lebed or the NIA who give false information about the stock. From their last 10K, it is clear that they have received very little revenue from Clearvale.
****************
Lebed doesnt make my investment decisions but I wouldnt think it wise to make investments against his picks in spite of him since it seems he does have a seemingly large group of followers.
*****************
Actually, picking against him is extremely wise since most of his pumps end up back in the dumps. His large group of followers is exactly what makes it good to pick against him, because his followers end up being bagholders.
***************
The facts that NIA point out are verifiable unless it says "We believe " or "In NIA's opinion"
*****************
Their "facts" have been shown to be wrong a number of times, including their last "fact" that they were rated #2 when they weren't.
*************
Seems to me they are not in the business of failure by the years of success they have had.
***************
Anyone with a huge following can have a track record of success by silently loading up on a low float stock, then sending out masses of emails to get your followers to buy the stock to force the price up.
If you check their past record, their picks don't do so well once they've dumped their holdings. It's because the price was artificially elevated by their pumping in the first place.
