Tornado Alley (PROG)

[F6]

Natural Born Drillers

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: March 15, 2012

To be a modern Republican in good standing, you have to believe — or pretend to believe — in two miracle cures for whatever ails the economy: more tax cuts for the rich and more drilling for oil. And with prices at the pump on the rise, so is the chant of “Drill, baby, drill.” More and more, Republicans are telling us that gasoline would be cheap and jobs plentiful if only we would stop protecting the environment and let energy companies do whatever they want.

Thus Mitt Romney claims that gasoline prices are high not because of saber-rattling over Iran, but because President Obama won’t allow unrestricted drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Meanwhile, Stephen Moore of The Wall Street Journal tells readers [ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203370604577265773038268282.html ] that America as a whole could have a jobs boom, just like North Dakota, if only the environmentalists would get out of the way.

The irony here is that these claims come just as events are confirming what everyone who did the math already knew, namely, that U.S. energy policy has very little effect either on oil prices or on overall U.S. employment. For the truth is that we’re already having a hydrocarbon boom, with U.S. oil and gas production rising and U.S. fuel imports dropping. If there were any truth to drill-here-drill-now, this boom should have yielded substantially lower gasoline prices and lots of new jobs. Predictably, however, it has done neither.

Why the hydrocarbon boom? It’s all about the fracking. The combination of horizontal drilling with hydraulic fracturing of shale and other low-permeability rocks has opened up large reserves of oil and natural gas [ http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/natural-gas/index.html ] to production. As a result, U.S. oil production has risen significantly over the past three years, reversing a decline over decades, while natural gas production has exploded.

Given this expansion, it’s hard to claim that excessive regulation has crippled energy production. Indeed, reporting in The Times makes it clear that U.S. policy has been seriously negligent — that the environmental costs of fracking have been underplayed and ignored. But, in a way, that’s the point. The reality is that far from being hobbled by eco-freaks, the energy industry has been given a largely free hand to expand domestic oil and gas production, never mind the environment.

Strange to say, however, while natural gas prices have dropped, rising oil production and a sharp fall in import dependence haven’t stopped gasoline prices from rising toward $4 a gallon. Nor has the oil and gas boom given a noticeable boost to an economic recovery that, despite better news lately, has been very disappointing on the jobs front.

As I said, this was totally predictable.

First up, oil prices. Unlike natural gas, which is expensive to ship across oceans, oil is traded on a world market — and the big developments moving prices in that market usually have little to do with events in the United States. Oil prices are up because of rising demand from China and other emerging economies, and more recently because of war scares in the Middle East; these forces easily outweigh any downward pressure on prices from rising U.S. production. And the same thing would happen if Republicans got their way and oil companies were set free to drill freely in the Gulf of Mexico and punch holes in the tundra: the effect on prices at the pump would be negligible.

Meanwhile, what about jobs? I have to admit that I started laughing when I saw The Wall Street Journal offering North Dakota as a role model. Yes, the oil boom there has pushed unemployment down to 3.2 percent, but that’s only possible because the whole state has fewer residents than metropolitan Albany — so few residents that adding a few thousand jobs in the state’s extractive sector is a really big deal. The comparable-sized fracking boom in Pennsylvania has had hardly any effect on the state’s overall employment picture, because, in the end, not that many jobs are involved.

And this tells us that giving the oil companies carte blanche isn’t a serious jobs program. Put it this way: Employment in oil and gas extraction has risen more than 50 percent since the middle of the last decade, but that amounts to only 70,000 jobs, around one-twentieth of 1 percent of total U.S. employment. So the idea that drill, baby, drill can cure our jobs deficit is basically a joke.

Why, then, are Republicans pretending otherwise? Part of the answer is that the party is rewarding its benefactors: the oil and gas industry doesn’t create many jobs, but it does spend a lot of money on lobbying and campaign contributions. The rest of the answer is simply the fact that conservatives have no other job-creation ideas to offer.

And intellectual bankruptcy, I’m sorry to say, is a problem that no amount of drilling and fracking can solve.

*

Related News

Series: Drilling Down
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/us/series/drilling_down/index.html

*

© 2012 The New York Times Company

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/opinion/krugman-natural-born-drillers.html [with comments]

---

(linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73329649 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73328848 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73161417 (and any future following)

from earlier this string, http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73146372

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72941586 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72906899 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72698744 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72644315 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72553804 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72538575 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72471513 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72428489 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72407087 and following (including Stephanie's parallel post to this one posted as I was finishing preparing this one, at http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73354274 )

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69949184 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73337928 and preceding (and any future following)