True...a judge can allow (and generally disallow) any argument that he feels may be relevant or not to a case.
IT DOES NOT MEAN THERE IS ANY IOTA OF EVEN A POSSIBILITY OF IT BEING A TRUE MAATER OF ANY TYPE.
So what do you thinK...judge saying "....you want to bring some evidence to the court that it was A two headed blue martian posing as you that killed the clerk....go right ahead....", or deny you the right, which makes for a reason to appeal his decisions?
Duh! If anything, he did say that even if there was an NSS thing, it would likely have little or no bearing on the bankruptcy case that the company filed. (Showing that the shareowners of the company were defrauded is totally unimportant, except to prove the complete worthlessness of the company, to the bankruptcy court).
AND HERE IS THE BIGGIE...LIKE THE 2 HEADED MARTIAN...EVEN WITH AT LEAST AS MANY CLAIMING THEY BOTH EXIST...NOT ONE DROP, NOT ONE SCINTELLA OF ANYTHING WAS BROUGHT TO THE COURT TO HVE IT EVEN DECIDE THE EVIDENCE WAS REAL. Nope nothing. Because like the 2 headed martian that takes a wackos identy and he wants to blame for his stupid acts....it doesn't exist.
