The Dog House

[SJOGRINGO]

""I'm sure all the transactions will be very much above board""

doughboy2 Share Friday, July 30, 2010 11:40:46 AM
Re: nutinbutdatroof post# 169957 Post #169962 of 242991
Absolutely.

I'm sure all the transactions will be very much above board.

nutinbutdatroof Share Friday, July 30, 2010 11:38:04 AM
Re: doughboy2 post# 169940 Post #169957 of 242991
As CEO Mr. Bradley has a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders and to conduct all transactions at arm's length.

But on the other hand, he and his team of attorney friends may know how to circumnavigate the law to facilitate self dealing transactions.

I personally don't know which is true.

doughboy2 Share Friday, July 30, 2010 11:14:46 AM
Re: Stockfire409 post# 169933 Post #169940 of 242991

But, another scenario could be true as well - not saying it is.

Dean purchased these companies with his own money.

He could roll these companies into QASP with the agreement that he is paid for them at a later date. Your way is scammy, to say the least.

Stockfire409 Share Friday, July 30, 2010 11:06:31 AM
Re: Woodsy post# 169928 Post #169933 of 242991

I'm not sure the legalities of it but it seems like some sort of embezzelment to me. PR that you company is aquiring another company, make a shell company, then sell it to the company that PR'd. You pay yourself with the company 1's money you aquired through dilution and presto...the PR'ing company sure did aquire another company and the CEO gets to pocket the cash for the sale.

Woodsy Share Friday, July 30, 2010 11:01:50 AM
Re: Mineiro post# 169866 Post #169928 of 242991
Yeah. If there are none, and those release were lies, there will be charges filed, IMO. I am REALLY curious about those. Safe harbor BS doesn't cut it if you simply fabricate acquisitions!

Mineiro Share Friday, July 30, 2010 10:19:00 AM
Re: MarketGeometry post# 169863 Post #169866 of 242991

There are no aquisitions! Dean will blame that on someone else too.

MarketGeometry Share Friday, July 30, 2010 10:18:06 AM
Re: spencyg post# 169860 Post #169863 of 242991

If they disclose info likes names of acqusiion market can verify that and wont have to wait for audits.

spencyg Share Friday, July 30, 2010 10:15:17 AM
Re: None Post #169860 of 242991
One looming problem I envision is that nobody will take this company seriously, even if they get the money. At this point, most people who were once jazzed about the possibilities here have moved on in disgust. I don't think we'll see any huge run as so many have predicted merely because not enough people will actually believe what is happenning. We have been told misinformation time and time again for over a year. I think that people will still want proof of the money if he PR's that he has received it, and the audits which were just completed won't show the receipt of those funds. Not until maybe the end of the year would any proof of funding exist.

I think it is funny that some here suggest that those who sell just to break even will be regretful are insane...at this point, breaking even for me would be a great victory. "You don't lose until you sell"....right. My account is worth 1/3 of my initial investment and dropping daily. How dare you say I haven't lost anything?
All in my most humble and angry opinion.

Where the heck is the SEC?????