Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:52:23 PM
Trying to look at your comments objectively, probably the most pertinent point to the contrary for the shareholder, is that the company bought out by SFBE must have felt that a valuation of 22 cents for SFBE was an appropriate valuation for SFBE, otherwise why would they ever accepted so few shares.
The other things one might imply would be as follows
#1 there is likely a provision to buy the remainder of the company at an even higher price (for fewer shares yet).
#2 the company bought out must feel their technology can be not only synergistic with SFBE but accretive to the bottom line, which ultimately will increase their profit or ROI.
#3 the current price of 8 or 9 cents is an absolute steel.
Again trying to be objective here. I think when investing it is always wise to neither LOVE or HATE the stocks you follow. Just here to make money.(: When you lose your objectivity you will make bad decisions either losing money invested or missing out on an opportunity to make lots of money.(:
Personally IMO, I think this will be big a winner not only short term but long term.
Recent SFBE News
- Form 1-A - Offering Statement [Regulation A] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/01/2024 04:07:45 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM