AI
Saturday, April 02, 2011 10:38:20 PM
Many Low-Wage Jobs Seen as Failing to Meet Basic Needs
A study on economic stability says many jobs today are unlikely to cover fundamentals like housing, utilities and food.
Justin Lane/European Pressphoto Agency
People rely on food banks, like the Community Food and Outreach Center in Orlando, Fla.
Todd Anderson for The New York Times
By MOTOKO RICH
Published: March 31, 2011
Hard as it can be to land a job these days, getting one may not be nearly enough for basic economic security.
The Labor Department will release its monthly snapshot of the job market on Friday, and economists expect it to show that the nation’s employers added about 190,000 jobs in March [see http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61604392 ]. With an unemployment rate that has been stubbornly stuck near 9 percent, those workers could be considered lucky.
But many of the jobs being added in retail, hospitality and home health care, to name a few categories, are unlikely to pay enough for workers to cover the cost of fundamentals like housing, utilities, food, health care, transportation and, in the case of working parents, child care.
A separate report being released Friday tries to go beyond traditional measurements like the poverty line and minimum wage to show what people need to earn to achieve a basic standard of living.
The study, commissioned by Wider Opportunities for Women, a nonprofit group, builds on an analysis the group and some state and local partners have been conducting since 1995 on how much income it takes to meet basic needs without relying on public subsidies. The new study aims to set thresholds for economic stability rather than mere survival, and takes into account saving for retirement and emergencies.
“We wanted to recognize that there was a cumulative impact that would affect one’s lifelong economic security,” said Joan A. Kuriansky, executive director of Wider Opportunities, whose report is called “The Basic Economic Security Tables for the United States.” “And we’ve all seen how often we have emergencies that we are unprepared for,” she said, especially during the recession. Layoffs or other health crises “can definitely begin to draw us into poverty.”
According to the report, a single worker needs an income of $30,012 a year — or just above $14 an hour — to cover basic expenses and save for retirement and emergencies. That is close to three times the 2010 national poverty level of $10,830 for a single person, and nearly twice the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour.
A single worker with two young children needs an annual income of $57,756, or just over $27 an hour, to attain economic stability, and a family with two working parents and two young children needs to earn $67,920 a year, or about $16 an hour per worker.
That compares with the national poverty level of $22,050 for a family of four. The most recent data from the Census Bureau [ http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/us/17poverty.html ] found that 14.3 percent of Americans were living below the poverty line in 2009.
Wider Opportunities and its consulting partners saw a need for an index that would indicate how much families need to earn if, for example, they want to save for their children’s college education or for a down payment on a home.
“It’s an index that asks how can a family have a little grasp at the middle class,” said Michael Sherraden, director of the Center for Social Development at Washington University in St. Louis, who consulted on the project and helped develop projections for how much income families need to devote to savings. “If we’re interested in families being able to be stable and not have their lives disrupted and have a little protection and backup and be able to educate their children, then this is the way we have to think.”
The numbers will not come as a surprise to working families who are struggling. Tara, a medical biller who declined to give her last name, said that she earns $15 an hour, while her husband, who works in building maintenance, makes $11.50 an hour. The couple, who live in Jamaica, Queens, have three sons, aged 9, 8 and 6.
“We tried to cut back on a lot of things,” she said. But the couple has been unable to make ends meet on their wages, and visit the River Fund food pantry in Richmond Hill every Saturday. With no money for savings, “I’m hoping that I will hit the lotto soon,” she said.
To develop its income assessments, the report’s authors examined government and other publicly available data to determine basic costs of living. For housing, which along with utilities is usually a family’s largest expense, the authors came up with “a decent standard of shelter which is accessible to those with limited income” by averaging data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development that identified a monthly cost equivalent for rent at the fortieth percentile among all rents paid in each metropolitan area across the country.
They chose a “low cost” food plan from the nutritional guidelines of the Department of Agriculture, and calculated commuting costs “assuming the ownership of a small sedan.” For health care, they calculated expenses for workers both with and without employer-based benefits.
Ms. Kuriansky said that the income projections do not take into account frills like gifts or meals out. “It’s a very bare-bones budget,” she said.
Obviously, the income needs change drastically depending on where a family lives. Ms. Kuriansky said the group was working on developing data for states and metropolitan areas.
The report compares its standards against national median incomes derived from the census, and finds that both single parents and workers who have only a high school diploma or only some college earn median wages that fall well below the amount needed to ensure economic security.
Workers who only finished high school have fared badly in the recession and the nascent recovery. According to an analysis of Labor Department data by Cliff Waldman, the economist at the Manufacturers Alliance, a trade group, the gap in unemployment rates more than doubled between those with just a high school diploma and those with at least a four-year college degree from the start of 2008 through February.
For some of the least educated, Mr. Waldman fears that even low wages are out of reach. “Given the needs of a more cognitive and more versatile labor force,” he said, “I’m afraid that those that don’t have the education are going to be part of a structural unemployment story.”
Even for those who do get jobs, it may be hard to live without public services, say nonprofit groups that assist low-income workers. “Politicians are so worried about fraud and abuse,” said Carol Goertzel, president of PathWays PA, a nonprofit that serves families in the Philadelphia region. “But they are not seeing the picture of families who are working but simply not making enough money to support their families, and need public support.”
In New York, Áine Duggan, vice president for research, policy and education at the Food Bank for New York City, estimates that about a third of the group’s clients are working but not earning enough to cover basic needs, much less saving for retirement or an emergency. She said that among households with children and annual incomes of less than $25,000, 83 percent of them would not be able to afford food within three months of losing the family income. That is up from 68 percent in 2008 at the height of the recession.
As the nation’s employers add jobs, it is not yet clear how many of them are low wage jobs, especially those that do not come with benefits, like health care. Manufacturing, for example, has been relatively strong and tends to pay higher wages.
Over the last year, wages adjusted for inflation have been essentially flat. “If we were creating more low-paid jobs,” said John Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics, “we would expect more of a decline in real wages.”
© 2011 The New York Times Company
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/business/economy/01jobs.html [ http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/business/economy/01jobs.html?pagewanted=all ]
===
also e.g. (items linked in):
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60903677 and preceding
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60123735 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61334177 and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61631390 (and any future following)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60233584 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61293395 and preceding (including the other replies to http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61019065 at http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=61019065 and respective following)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61374443
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60650901 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61617635 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60633996 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60642164 and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52862196 and preceding (and any future following)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61021532
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61652618 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61339114 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61544799 and following
A study on economic stability says many jobs today are unlikely to cover fundamentals like housing, utilities and food.
Justin Lane/European Pressphoto Agency
People rely on food banks, like the Community Food and Outreach Center in Orlando, Fla.
Todd Anderson for The New York Times
By MOTOKO RICH
Published: March 31, 2011
Hard as it can be to land a job these days, getting one may not be nearly enough for basic economic security.
The Labor Department will release its monthly snapshot of the job market on Friday, and economists expect it to show that the nation’s employers added about 190,000 jobs in March [see http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61604392 ]. With an unemployment rate that has been stubbornly stuck near 9 percent, those workers could be considered lucky.
But many of the jobs being added in retail, hospitality and home health care, to name a few categories, are unlikely to pay enough for workers to cover the cost of fundamentals like housing, utilities, food, health care, transportation and, in the case of working parents, child care.
A separate report being released Friday tries to go beyond traditional measurements like the poverty line and minimum wage to show what people need to earn to achieve a basic standard of living.
The study, commissioned by Wider Opportunities for Women, a nonprofit group, builds on an analysis the group and some state and local partners have been conducting since 1995 on how much income it takes to meet basic needs without relying on public subsidies. The new study aims to set thresholds for economic stability rather than mere survival, and takes into account saving for retirement and emergencies.
“We wanted to recognize that there was a cumulative impact that would affect one’s lifelong economic security,” said Joan A. Kuriansky, executive director of Wider Opportunities, whose report is called “The Basic Economic Security Tables for the United States.” “And we’ve all seen how often we have emergencies that we are unprepared for,” she said, especially during the recession. Layoffs or other health crises “can definitely begin to draw us into poverty.”
According to the report, a single worker needs an income of $30,012 a year — or just above $14 an hour — to cover basic expenses and save for retirement and emergencies. That is close to three times the 2010 national poverty level of $10,830 for a single person, and nearly twice the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour.
A single worker with two young children needs an annual income of $57,756, or just over $27 an hour, to attain economic stability, and a family with two working parents and two young children needs to earn $67,920 a year, or about $16 an hour per worker.
That compares with the national poverty level of $22,050 for a family of four. The most recent data from the Census Bureau [ http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/us/17poverty.html ] found that 14.3 percent of Americans were living below the poverty line in 2009.
Wider Opportunities and its consulting partners saw a need for an index that would indicate how much families need to earn if, for example, they want to save for their children’s college education or for a down payment on a home.
“It’s an index that asks how can a family have a little grasp at the middle class,” said Michael Sherraden, director of the Center for Social Development at Washington University in St. Louis, who consulted on the project and helped develop projections for how much income families need to devote to savings. “If we’re interested in families being able to be stable and not have their lives disrupted and have a little protection and backup and be able to educate their children, then this is the way we have to think.”
The numbers will not come as a surprise to working families who are struggling. Tara, a medical biller who declined to give her last name, said that she earns $15 an hour, while her husband, who works in building maintenance, makes $11.50 an hour. The couple, who live in Jamaica, Queens, have three sons, aged 9, 8 and 6.
“We tried to cut back on a lot of things,” she said. But the couple has been unable to make ends meet on their wages, and visit the River Fund food pantry in Richmond Hill every Saturday. With no money for savings, “I’m hoping that I will hit the lotto soon,” she said.
To develop its income assessments, the report’s authors examined government and other publicly available data to determine basic costs of living. For housing, which along with utilities is usually a family’s largest expense, the authors came up with “a decent standard of shelter which is accessible to those with limited income” by averaging data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development that identified a monthly cost equivalent for rent at the fortieth percentile among all rents paid in each metropolitan area across the country.
They chose a “low cost” food plan from the nutritional guidelines of the Department of Agriculture, and calculated commuting costs “assuming the ownership of a small sedan.” For health care, they calculated expenses for workers both with and without employer-based benefits.
Ms. Kuriansky said that the income projections do not take into account frills like gifts or meals out. “It’s a very bare-bones budget,” she said.
Obviously, the income needs change drastically depending on where a family lives. Ms. Kuriansky said the group was working on developing data for states and metropolitan areas.
The report compares its standards against national median incomes derived from the census, and finds that both single parents and workers who have only a high school diploma or only some college earn median wages that fall well below the amount needed to ensure economic security.
Workers who only finished high school have fared badly in the recession and the nascent recovery. According to an analysis of Labor Department data by Cliff Waldman, the economist at the Manufacturers Alliance, a trade group, the gap in unemployment rates more than doubled between those with just a high school diploma and those with at least a four-year college degree from the start of 2008 through February.
For some of the least educated, Mr. Waldman fears that even low wages are out of reach. “Given the needs of a more cognitive and more versatile labor force,” he said, “I’m afraid that those that don’t have the education are going to be part of a structural unemployment story.”
Even for those who do get jobs, it may be hard to live without public services, say nonprofit groups that assist low-income workers. “Politicians are so worried about fraud and abuse,” said Carol Goertzel, president of PathWays PA, a nonprofit that serves families in the Philadelphia region. “But they are not seeing the picture of families who are working but simply not making enough money to support their families, and need public support.”
In New York, Áine Duggan, vice president for research, policy and education at the Food Bank for New York City, estimates that about a third of the group’s clients are working but not earning enough to cover basic needs, much less saving for retirement or an emergency. She said that among households with children and annual incomes of less than $25,000, 83 percent of them would not be able to afford food within three months of losing the family income. That is up from 68 percent in 2008 at the height of the recession.
As the nation’s employers add jobs, it is not yet clear how many of them are low wage jobs, especially those that do not come with benefits, like health care. Manufacturing, for example, has been relatively strong and tends to pay higher wages.
Over the last year, wages adjusted for inflation have been essentially flat. “If we were creating more low-paid jobs,” said John Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics, “we would expect more of a decline in real wages.”
© 2011 The New York Times Company
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/business/economy/01jobs.html [ http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/business/economy/01jobs.html?pagewanted=all ]
===
also e.g. (items linked in):
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60903677 and preceding
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60123735 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61334177 and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61631390 (and any future following)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60233584 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61293395 and preceding (including the other replies to http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61019065 at http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=61019065 and respective following)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61374443
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60650901 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61617635 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60633996 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60642164 and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52862196 and preceding (and any future following)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61021532
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61652618 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61339114 and preceding and following
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61544799 and following
Greensburg, KS - 5/4/07
"Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty."
from John Philpot Curran, Speech
upon the Right of Election, 1790
F6
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
