Remote Dynamics Inc (RMTD)

[ICEQUITY]

Please forward to Telogis: I do hereby state that iHub has informed and advised me of the Telogis complaint regarding infringement of copyright and intellectual property that has allegedly been posted on Remote Dynamics(RMTD) discussion board/info box.

It is my duty to inform the RMTD investors, of the issue regarding this matter. So we the investors of Remote Dynamics that participate in this discussion, will all have the same information and resolve the current situation.

IH Geek [Dave] Member Level
Monday, December 06, 2010 7:36:27 PM

Please be advised that iHub has received DMCA notices that you have infringed upon Telogis trademark, logo and copyrighted content from Telogis' website by including them in the Remote Dynamics iBox and your posts. Infringing on others' intellectual property is a violation of iHub's Terms of Service as well as federal law.

If you believe the claim of copyright infringement is improper or incorrect please advise us of such. Otherwise, you are hereby instructed to cease posting of such content without the prior consent of the property owner.

The Remote Dynamics iBox has been removed in its entity. If you enter new content please ensure that it is compliant with iHub's Terms of Service, including but not limited to infringing upon others' intellectual property rights.

Dave

Thank you Dave for advising me that I have infringed upon the Telogis trademark, logo that they created and placed on the Remote Dynamics website. Also the copyrighted content from Telogis' website by including them in the Remote Dynamics iBox and also my posts.

I would like to make sure that we are perfectly clear on our understanding, that nothing from the http://wwww.remotedynamics.com website can no longer be used on the iHub Remote Dynamics Discussion Board or information box that includes the infringing content from my post.

Your advice is well noted and I will take it under consideration next time I extract information from the property of Telogis. Further more I will abide by The United States Law regarding Copyright and Intellectual Property

(DMCA)

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works.

Source - Wikipedia

I do not believe the claim of copyright infringement is improper or incorrect, if Telogis is admitting that Logo was copied from their web site www.remotedynamics.com and posted in the Remote Dynamics iHub information box. The version I had posted stated "Telogis formerly Remote Dynamics", which was changed shortly after and "formerly Remote Dynamics" was removed from the logo. But It was my preference to keep it original.

That is good to know that Telogis is well aware of what is said and posted here on the Remote Dynamics Discussion Board. If there is a reason why Telogis or Remote Dynamics have not updated the shareholders of the current situation, then let me not cause any more delay and distraction so they can release that information.

Please forward this to Telogis, I would like to put them on notice and advise Telogis that infringing upon RMTD's intellectual property and trademark rights without compensation to the current shareholders would not be in Telogis best interest.

If there is any improper or incorrect actions by any or both companies (RMTD/Telogis), I will be pleased to advise iHub and yourself Dave of such.

I have been instructed to cease posting of such content without the prior consent of the property owner. To acquire this consent I would just have to send a written letter to Property owners regarding both RMTD? Gary Hallgren - CEO of Remote Dynamics
is now the VP, Corporate Strategy at Telogis, would mean I would just have to send one letter Telogis? Would you confirm that information or would they like to see the list of people formerly at RMTD, now with management positions at Telogis?

Exhibit 1 Nothing here was pulled from Telogis/RMTD
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=57390465

1.a "Conflict of duty and interest"

As fiduciaries, the directors may not put themselves in a position where their interests and duties conflict with the duties that they owe to the company.


1.b "Transactions with the company"

Statutory duty to declare interests in relation to any transactions, and the director can be fined for failing to make disclosure.

1.c "Competing with the company"
Directors cannot compete directly with the company without a conflict of interest arising. Similarly, they should not act as directors of competing companies, as their duties to each company would then conflict with each other.


1.d "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"

Quote

:In the United States, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) has introduced new standards of accountability on the board of directors for U.S. companies or companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges. Under the Act, members of the board risk large fines and prison sentences in the case of accounting crimes. Internal control is now the direct responsibility of directors. This means that the vast majority of public companies now have hired internal auditors to ensure that the company adheres to the highest standards of internal controls. Additionally, these internal auditors are required by law to report directly to the audit board. This group consists of board of directors members where more than half of the members are outside the company and one of those members outside the company is an accounting expert.

If Telogis or Directors of RMTD have done no wrong, and this issue was do to just accounting problems.... We should have this resolved in no time.

Exhibit 2
Dismissal of independent registered public accounting firm

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1145700/000121390009002533/f8k080109_vitallving.htm


U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Quote

Litigation Release No. 21189A / August 27, 2009
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No.3040/ August 27, 2009
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MICHAEL J. MOORE AND MOORE & ASSOCIATES CHARTERED, Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-01637 (D. Nev.)
SEC CHARGES LAS VEGAS-BASED CPA AND HIS ACCOUNTING FIRM WITH FRAUD

Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a Las Vegas-based CPA and his public accounting firm with securities fraud for issuing false audit reports that failed to comply with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB")

2.b

The SEC's complaint also alleges that Moore and M&A violated Sections 10A(a)(1) and10A(b)(1) of the Exchange Act by failing to include audit procedures designed to detect and report likely illegal acts. The complaint further alleges that Moore and M&A improperly modified audit documentation in violation of Regulation S-X Rule 2-06.

To settle the Commission's charges, Moore and M&A consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining them from future violations of Sections 10(b), 10A(a)(1), and 10A(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Regulation S-X Rules 2-02(b)(1) and 2-06 and ordering them to disgorge $179,750 plus prejudgment interest of $10,151.59. Moore separately agreed to pay a $130,000 penalty. Moore and M&A also consented to the entry of an administrative order that makes findings and suspends them from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3) of the Commission's Rules of Practice.

Exhibit 3 FORM 8-K

Strict Foreclosure Agreement by and among Vital Living, Inc. and Ceautamed Worldwide, LLC, dated August 1, 2009

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1145700/000121390009002533/f8k080109_vitallving.htm
Quote:

On August 1, 2009, Vital Living, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Vital Living” or the “Company”), entered into a strict foreclosure agreement (the “Strict Foreclosure Agreement”) with Ceautamed Worldwide, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Ceautamed”), pursuant to which, under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, Vital Living surrendered and transferred to Ceautamed all the Collateral (as defined in the Security Agreement filed hereto as Exhibit 10.2) set forth in Schedule A of the Strict Foreclosure Agreement. A copy of the Strict Foreclosure Agreement is included as Exhibit 10.3 to this current report and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Exhibit 4
BOUNCE MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC.: BNCM (Pink Sheets)
Form Description (Filer) View File Size Received ( Period )
15-12G Termination of Registration of a Class of Security under Section 12(g) VITAL LIVING PRODUCTS INC View Filing in 05/13/02
http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/sec/filing.asp?Symbol=BNCM

Exhibit 5Remote Dynamics acquired 100% of the capital stock of BounceGPS, Inc.

http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHtmlSection1?SectionID=6515009-9158-38453&SessionID=xWzZHF7Jkd7nYG7

On November 30, 2006, we agreed to acquire from Bounce Mobile Systems, Inc. (“BMSI”) 100% of the capital stock of BounceGPS, Inc., a provider of mobile asset management solutions, in exchange for:

Executive offices are located at 400 Chisholm Place, Suite 411, Plano, Texas 75075, and our telephone number is [phone]. Our website URL is www.remotedynamics.com. References to “we”, “us”, “our”, “Remote Dynamics, Inc.”, or “RMTD” refer to Remote Dynamics, Inc. and its subsidiaries. REDIview™ is a registered trademark of Remote Dynamics, Inc.

Until I'm told any different what is on that website ids the property of Remote Dynamics. Would I be correct in saying Telogis wants to claim copyright infringement from information on a Remote Dynamics owned site?

Exhibit 6
Quote

:On or about April 13, 2009, we will complete an increase in the number of our authorized shares of common stock to 15,000,000,000.

6.a
597,073,279 shares outstanding as disclosed by the Company

Aggregate Amount Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person 24,796,340,293... Representing 98.6% of the Company's outstanding Common Stock Dated: June 12, 2008

EXHIBIT 7

7/22/2010
Assignor REMOTE DYNAMICS Trademark "REDIVIEW" assignee BOUNCE MOBILE SYSTEMS,INC AS ACTING COLLATERAL AGENT.

CONVEYANCE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT TO BOUNCE MOBILE SYTEMS, INC.

WHICH IN TURN ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE INTEREST TO TELOGIS

EXHIBIT 8
Telogis has a complaint, I will comply with there request. But if you follow the dates Telogis agreed for this deal, knowing the current situation because it is all public knowledge. How can Bounce Mobile Systems have any legal right to take REDIview and sell it to Telogis? When the SEC had found the accounting to be fraudulent, when this company had sold its assets 3 too many times. And with the Directors on board with Telogis, I find Telogis guilty by association.

These wonderful pictures were created by RMTD boardmembers, and I think I have permission to use them.

Everything I stated was in my Opinion
I rest my case....