Mrkipp, Thanks for your reply.If i may respond with some clarifications of my own.
1."Of course that is a theoretical bottom- but only one of many theoretical bottoms. That's easy to state. But you state it as if it's the likely bottom, which, of course, it isn't. And which is the point. What you should really state, if you were being honest, is that that's where you would like the bottom to be and so you peg it there in hopes of promoting that outcome."
-----It has been my observation that all future price movements are "theoritical" in nature,and correctly you have said there are many"bottoms",as there are "tops". However; I made mention the reasons for my "opinion" about "True" bottom, is at the price at which greed destroys itself..Alpha will not lose money on purpose by undefcutting it's own srike. I hav also, made no secret that I intend to enter a new posiiton in that price zone,so your allusion of any "secret agenda" i may have, is simply moot.
2."This ignores all the positive underlying attributes of the company, such as impending JV, anticipated drilling results, uranium claims in Arizona, and , most importantly the gold and copper deposits in the ground at BC and Pebble that constitute one the richest holdings in the world."
------Huh? I have always said this is a great play long term...I simply want a proper entry...I'm not negating anything here.But we must factor in retail investor psychology short term..no?
3."As for market forces, you vastly overestimate the power of the plaintiffs- yes- there will be some small amount of dilution and yes there will be intermittent periods of exaggerated selling pressure"
---Again,I haven't overestimated anything,I certainly will not underestimate it either. The reality is,no one truly knows if and how, plaintifs may or may not be manipulating this thing..which borders on uncertainty...no?
4."But you also vastly underestimate the steadfastness of the many investors who continue to hold and enlarge their already substantial positions, which together dwarfs the position of the plaintiffs"
-----While i admire "your" stedfastedness,I hope you aware of two things..one being..not all investors who own this stock,make ihub the daily source of news and inspirations (shockin i know)...secondly,I hope you are not saying with a straight face,that yo are speaking on behalf of persons whom you believe to share your investing goals,just becasue you talk to them on a message board?. Too many long and strongs,turn into weak,and feeble,when trends turn violently. It's alwasy best to just speak for yourself IMO,since everyone here are just strangers,with a story,and a made up nicknames.
5. "And this is the certainty which will give lie to your "prediction"
---I truly wish I was clairvoyant,investing would be easier.lol. I have no such gift :/,i merely have opinions on what i believe to be facts in a given situation. I have found that my level heaed approach, makes me lot of money,or at teh very least,saves me lots of money.
Long said this will never see 0.5..,and yet here we are. I guess i was just too dumb to follow thier logic.
6."Do you really think you deserve a raise?"
---ehhh..Absolutley,why not?
In closing,I think your angst is misplaced. I'm not bashing this stock in hope sof a lower entry. No sane person should believe a moron on a stock board can single handedly, affect price movements. I am simply sharing my moronic opinion. SO far i have been right,and will be richly rewarded for not followin the herd mentality. I can't control IF this stock goes to under a penny,but i certainly belive that it CAN,especially if no news.
Healthy debate is a good thing IMO..i'm probably wrong anyways..time will tell..it always doe.?
just my useless .02 as usual. (downgrade)
