Saturday, September 04, 2010 11:39:12 PM
The Kochs: paying to keep America dumb
September 1, 2010, 2:19PM
AJ Goode and his wife Mary who live in a shelter in Los Angeles - BBC News ..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11145513
Around the world people ask themselves, if Americans are so dumb, why is the country so
rich? Americans are not really born that stupid, but making them stupid is a huge industry.
The Koch Brothers .. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?printable=true .. are leaders in that industry.
At this juncture, the interests of America's wealthy are totally separate from those of the middle class and working class base just as they would be in a third world autocracy and the only way for them to keep the hoi poloi on board, in what is still formally a democracy, is by endless war, endless fear and xenophobia. [my emphasis] That is why so much is being spent on think tanks and AstroTurf organizations.
Two things strike me right off the bat:
1. It costs a huge amount of money to get people to vote and to be organized against their own vital interests.
2. I believe it would be absurdly cheap to demolish the entire Koch strategy.
Knowing how vulnerable and absurd their ideas are is why people like the Kochs are more than willing to spend that type of money, just as the Dutch are willing to spend a fortune to be able to live below sea level or why it costs more money to fly in a plane than to fall off a cliff, because they all entail thwarting the natural tendency of things.
What is the tendency of our world, where is it headed?
Anyone who is paying attention realizes that the world of the future is going to be so dangerous and so complex, what with climate change, wars for food and water and genetic manipulation, that it is either going to be heavily regulated or it will be a hell that will make Blade Runner look like Hannah Montana. [my emphasis] The Kochs are obviously cool with that, with their kind of money they will live well in an America filled with the desperately poor, just like Mexican or African billionaires do in their countries, but they are smart enough to realize that if most people ever came to their senses they would not be one bit enthusiastic for such a program. So a huge amount of money is being spent to keep people from understanding reality and to ridicule those who do.
You have to ask yourself how an espèce d'ordure like George W. Bush ever got elected president and stayed president in the first place and then accept that those very same forces are still at work today.
The big question is...
Why can't the Democrats who were once supposed to be the "people's party", come up with candidates that connect solidly with "deep" America.
How is it that a piece of work like Sarah Palin is the one who isn't (wasn't) .. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/10/sarah-palin-201010?printable=true .. a millionaire, the one who went to a state university, the one who was a commercial fisherman, (fisherperson?) served on the PTA and whose husband carries a steelworker's union card? Why is this objectively working class woman .. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/08/sarah-palins-complicated-relationship-with-the-labor-movement/62166/ .. a Republican of the most brutish sort?
Why is it that the only Democrat that seems acutely aware of this problem is a born aristocrat like Howard Dean?
This is the real question.
Can you have a working class movement without the working class?
To paraphrase the demon Rumsfeld, you go with the working class you have, not with the working class you would like to have.
America's working people are in desperate .. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11145513 .. need of health, education and welfare, but they are also mostly social conservatives. They generally are religious.
Why should this social conservatism and religiosity automatically be a force for economic reaction? Why should this folk culture serve the interests of people like the truly elitist Koch brothers, who are objectively the enemies of the working poor?
There is nothing in the teaching of Jesus Christ that intrinsically supports economic libertarianism, xenophobia, racism, military adventures at the expense of health or education, or connects in any way with the beggar thy neighborism of the disciples of Ayn Rand.
Imagine how the following text would sit with Ayn Rand or the Koch Brothers, in fact, can you imagine it being spoken at Tea Party event?
'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.' They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?' He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least among you, you did not do for me.' Matthew 25:41-45
Or these
If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth. 1 John 3:17-18
If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered. Proverbs 21:13
He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God. Proverbs 14:31
He who gives to the poor will lack nothing, but he who closes his eyes to them receives many curses. Proverbs 28:27
Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy. Proverbs 31:8-9
Do not take advantage of a hired man who is poor and needy, whether he is a brother Israelite or an alien living in one of your towns. Deuteronomy 24:14
(Hat to Scott Manley) .. http://thespiritualprogressive.blogspot.com/ ..
I believe that it is no coincidence that more emphasis is usually given in the USA to the apocalyptic "the end of days" scenario, than to the Biblical quotes above. Even the age old religion of the have nots in today's America has to be warped to suit the needs of those who have.
Certainly there is no better country than America in the whole world to be rich. It is probably the only country in the world where the rich are loved. Conversely there is no worse country in the world to be poor. America's working poor have every reason to be paranoid, the system literally hates them. [my emphasis]
Religion and populism go hand in hand. "Religion is the opium of the people" in the same sense that "opium is the opium of the cancer patient". At issue is pain, if you propose no real cure for the disease, why begrudge the palliative drug? Jesus offers a far better deal for the working poor than the Tea Party does.
Many progressives have problems with all of this, they are repelled by what they consider the gross superstition of creationism, for example. As to evolution, however, if the Democrats want to ever win southern white people or even a lot of evangelical black people, they had better not put evolution at the center of their program, More than religious, this is a cultural thing. Poor people never have liked Darwinism very much... think about it. What does "survival of the fittest" hold for them? What is their role in "the devil take the hindmost"?
Why are so many of the poor of America, white and black, socially conservative? Because without a welfare state, the only institutions that offer any comfort or protection are the church and the family. The family is the first welfare state. In the USA there is no welfare state and the family is also under heavy pressure from the system. Single parent families are increasingly common, .. http://family.jrank.org/pages/1574/Single-Parent-Families-Demographic-Trends.html .. The United States has the highest percentage of single-parent families (34% in 1998) among developed countries. The United States has one of the highest divorce rates in the world, twice that of Denmark, Canada, or the United Kingdom. The divorce rate is highest among lower income couples. With reason, poor people in America are terrified: frightened people take comfort where they can. A divorced waitress with two kids who has to take them to an emergency room to treat their asthma can't be criticized for being a "Left Behind" enthusiast: she and her kids fly up to heaven and the stingy tippers go to hell.
The Evangelicals love for creationism and the literal reading of scripture is because the Bible trumps the "experts"... any hick quoting the good book is superior to a PhD from MIT quoting Darwin. The same psychology holds true for "Rapture" enthusiasts, they will be saved, taken directly up to heaven and all the people who have ever treated them so shabbily here on earth will suffer indescribable torment and humiliation, which the chosen will be able to watch from heaven. This is a form of sedition.
I find any rebellion of the "lower orders" in the USA positive per se. I start from the premise that it is really the poor, the sniggered at, the excluded and the disadvantaged -- what are called the "lower classes" -- that have to be the protagonists of any authentic change. Up till now, all the "struggle" is coming from the top against the down. And many middle class Democrats that think they are progressives are merely water carriers for the "one percent".
What is new is that now it is America's lower middle classes, once the envy of the entire world, that can't pay for health and education any more and find themselves losing their homes and being pushed toward pauperization.
How can the billionaire's conspiracy be defeated on the cheap?
You have to start from where you are.
Perhaps the only thing that the white, black and Latino populations really have in common is their fear of destitution and their faith in Jesus.
The basic message of Christianity, especially the Evangelical variety, is that Jesus died in great agony on the cross to redeem those who believe in him, out of pure love for each of them, one at a time, although they have done nothing in particular to deserve this, the most precious of rewards.... and it's free... an "unlimited offer".
This means that a person who has been "born again", no matter if they are fat or have bad breath or don't have a high pay grade, are beloved and unique in the eyes of the central figure of Western civilization. Some may not think this is so special but they might admit that it is a culturally more grounded reason to feel special than because the brand of underwear they have on reflects their "unique lifestyle".
That is why, despite much of the grotesque tackiness and fanaticism of some of it, that, at the risk of sounding condescending, I find the Evangelical movement filled with such promise, because it alone, even without knowing it, is the only serious rebellion against the "unhappiness principal" that drives American capitalism. The entire American economy is based on making people feel bad about themselves, making them feel poor, ugly, sick, helpless, stupid, inadequate and then offering to sell them something to relieve the pain of rejection and failure. Americans are hardly ever away from a voice that tells them that they don't measure up to some impossible standard of perfection. The message is like the song, "all in all you're just another brick in the wall" ...unless you buy what the voice is selling.
The sort of Christianity practiced by America's charismatic Christians, both black and white, means that joy can be found for free... this is positively "un-American".
That is why I think that some sort of "liberation theology" is finally going to the only idea or movement that is going to change America. I'm sure that most of the Evangelicals that were attending the Republican convention would be horrified to know that British Socialism has its deepest roots .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_socialism .. in the Baptist and Methodist chapels of Wales and the industrial north of England. But there is no reason to believe that someone who drove the money changers out of the temple is a fan of Ayn Rand's.
I think that America's most deeply rooted institutions are now in conflict with our modern, globalized economy or as Joe Sleeper says:
(...) obeisance to every whim of global capital, which is abandoning Palin's small-town America and Obama's urban America, a capital whose injustices and consumer palliatives are subverting our republican institutions and character.
There has to be found or be created, an overlap between American progressives and the Evangelicals.
There has to be rebellion for anything to happen and the culture of the people has to be taken into account. The lower middle class and poor people of America are religious and we have to start from there. The only strategy that will ever reverse the enormous inequality and the oppression of the poor in the USA is an American version of "Liberation Theology". .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology ..
And remember it is cheap, really cheap, there are over 2000 years of what an MBA would call "sunk costs" working for it.
You don't believe in any of it?
No problem.
If you are truly progressive and want to change the system, then you should say like Henry of Navarre, .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_France .. "Paris vaut bien une messe"... Or study up on "Pascal's Wager". .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager
Like Howard Dean, I believe that America's progressives have to make their peace with evangelical America and find defenders of the "little man" that vibrate in the same cultural key as they do. Where is a contemporary William Jennings Bryan? .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan .. It is absurd that a credible case can be made that the Democrats are elitist, but it is being made effectively every day of the week.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/d/a/david_seaton/2010/09/the-kochs-paying-to-keep-ameri.php?ref=reccafe
Comment: though as a political strategy they do feel to make some sense, i'm not sure if i agree with all the sentiments of the author.
September 1, 2010, 2:19PM
AJ Goode and his wife Mary who live in a shelter in Los Angeles - BBC News ..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11145513
Around the world people ask themselves, if Americans are so dumb, why is the country so
rich? Americans are not really born that stupid, but making them stupid is a huge industry.
The Koch Brothers .. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?printable=true .. are leaders in that industry.
At this juncture, the interests of America's wealthy are totally separate from those of the middle class and working class base just as they would be in a third world autocracy and the only way for them to keep the hoi poloi on board, in what is still formally a democracy, is by endless war, endless fear and xenophobia. [my emphasis] That is why so much is being spent on think tanks and AstroTurf organizations.
Two things strike me right off the bat:
1. It costs a huge amount of money to get people to vote and to be organized against their own vital interests.
2. I believe it would be absurdly cheap to demolish the entire Koch strategy.
Knowing how vulnerable and absurd their ideas are is why people like the Kochs are more than willing to spend that type of money, just as the Dutch are willing to spend a fortune to be able to live below sea level or why it costs more money to fly in a plane than to fall off a cliff, because they all entail thwarting the natural tendency of things.
What is the tendency of our world, where is it headed?
Anyone who is paying attention realizes that the world of the future is going to be so dangerous and so complex, what with climate change, wars for food and water and genetic manipulation, that it is either going to be heavily regulated or it will be a hell that will make Blade Runner look like Hannah Montana. [my emphasis] The Kochs are obviously cool with that, with their kind of money they will live well in an America filled with the desperately poor, just like Mexican or African billionaires do in their countries, but they are smart enough to realize that if most people ever came to their senses they would not be one bit enthusiastic for such a program. So a huge amount of money is being spent to keep people from understanding reality and to ridicule those who do.
You have to ask yourself how an espèce d'ordure like George W. Bush ever got elected president and stayed president in the first place and then accept that those very same forces are still at work today.
The big question is...
Why can't the Democrats who were once supposed to be the "people's party", come up with candidates that connect solidly with "deep" America.
How is it that a piece of work like Sarah Palin is the one who isn't (wasn't) .. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/10/sarah-palin-201010?printable=true .. a millionaire, the one who went to a state university, the one who was a commercial fisherman, (fisherperson?) served on the PTA and whose husband carries a steelworker's union card? Why is this objectively working class woman .. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/08/sarah-palins-complicated-relationship-with-the-labor-movement/62166/ .. a Republican of the most brutish sort?
Why is it that the only Democrat that seems acutely aware of this problem is a born aristocrat like Howard Dean?
This is the real question.
Can you have a working class movement without the working class?
To paraphrase the demon Rumsfeld, you go with the working class you have, not with the working class you would like to have.
America's working people are in desperate .. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11145513 .. need of health, education and welfare, but they are also mostly social conservatives. They generally are religious.
Why should this social conservatism and religiosity automatically be a force for economic reaction? Why should this folk culture serve the interests of people like the truly elitist Koch brothers, who are objectively the enemies of the working poor?
There is nothing in the teaching of Jesus Christ that intrinsically supports economic libertarianism, xenophobia, racism, military adventures at the expense of health or education, or connects in any way with the beggar thy neighborism of the disciples of Ayn Rand.
Imagine how the following text would sit with Ayn Rand or the Koch Brothers, in fact, can you imagine it being spoken at Tea Party event?
'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.' They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?' He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least among you, you did not do for me.' Matthew 25:41-45
Or these
If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth. 1 John 3:17-18
If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered. Proverbs 21:13
He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God. Proverbs 14:31
He who gives to the poor will lack nothing, but he who closes his eyes to them receives many curses. Proverbs 28:27
Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy. Proverbs 31:8-9
Do not take advantage of a hired man who is poor and needy, whether he is a brother Israelite or an alien living in one of your towns. Deuteronomy 24:14
(Hat to Scott Manley) .. http://thespiritualprogressive.blogspot.com/ ..
I believe that it is no coincidence that more emphasis is usually given in the USA to the apocalyptic "the end of days" scenario, than to the Biblical quotes above. Even the age old religion of the have nots in today's America has to be warped to suit the needs of those who have.
Certainly there is no better country than America in the whole world to be rich. It is probably the only country in the world where the rich are loved. Conversely there is no worse country in the world to be poor. America's working poor have every reason to be paranoid, the system literally hates them. [my emphasis]
Religion and populism go hand in hand. "Religion is the opium of the people" in the same sense that "opium is the opium of the cancer patient". At issue is pain, if you propose no real cure for the disease, why begrudge the palliative drug? Jesus offers a far better deal for the working poor than the Tea Party does.
Many progressives have problems with all of this, they are repelled by what they consider the gross superstition of creationism, for example. As to evolution, however, if the Democrats want to ever win southern white people or even a lot of evangelical black people, they had better not put evolution at the center of their program, More than religious, this is a cultural thing. Poor people never have liked Darwinism very much... think about it. What does "survival of the fittest" hold for them? What is their role in "the devil take the hindmost"?
Why are so many of the poor of America, white and black, socially conservative? Because without a welfare state, the only institutions that offer any comfort or protection are the church and the family. The family is the first welfare state. In the USA there is no welfare state and the family is also under heavy pressure from the system. Single parent families are increasingly common, .. http://family.jrank.org/pages/1574/Single-Parent-Families-Demographic-Trends.html .. The United States has the highest percentage of single-parent families (34% in 1998) among developed countries. The United States has one of the highest divorce rates in the world, twice that of Denmark, Canada, or the United Kingdom. The divorce rate is highest among lower income couples. With reason, poor people in America are terrified: frightened people take comfort where they can. A divorced waitress with two kids who has to take them to an emergency room to treat their asthma can't be criticized for being a "Left Behind" enthusiast: she and her kids fly up to heaven and the stingy tippers go to hell.
The Evangelicals love for creationism and the literal reading of scripture is because the Bible trumps the "experts"... any hick quoting the good book is superior to a PhD from MIT quoting Darwin. The same psychology holds true for "Rapture" enthusiasts, they will be saved, taken directly up to heaven and all the people who have ever treated them so shabbily here on earth will suffer indescribable torment and humiliation, which the chosen will be able to watch from heaven. This is a form of sedition.
I find any rebellion of the "lower orders" in the USA positive per se. I start from the premise that it is really the poor, the sniggered at, the excluded and the disadvantaged -- what are called the "lower classes" -- that have to be the protagonists of any authentic change. Up till now, all the "struggle" is coming from the top against the down. And many middle class Democrats that think they are progressives are merely water carriers for the "one percent".
What is new is that now it is America's lower middle classes, once the envy of the entire world, that can't pay for health and education any more and find themselves losing their homes and being pushed toward pauperization.
How can the billionaire's conspiracy be defeated on the cheap?
You have to start from where you are.
Perhaps the only thing that the white, black and Latino populations really have in common is their fear of destitution and their faith in Jesus.
The basic message of Christianity, especially the Evangelical variety, is that Jesus died in great agony on the cross to redeem those who believe in him, out of pure love for each of them, one at a time, although they have done nothing in particular to deserve this, the most precious of rewards.... and it's free... an "unlimited offer".
This means that a person who has been "born again", no matter if they are fat or have bad breath or don't have a high pay grade, are beloved and unique in the eyes of the central figure of Western civilization. Some may not think this is so special but they might admit that it is a culturally more grounded reason to feel special than because the brand of underwear they have on reflects their "unique lifestyle".
That is why, despite much of the grotesque tackiness and fanaticism of some of it, that, at the risk of sounding condescending, I find the Evangelical movement filled with such promise, because it alone, even without knowing it, is the only serious rebellion against the "unhappiness principal" that drives American capitalism. The entire American economy is based on making people feel bad about themselves, making them feel poor, ugly, sick, helpless, stupid, inadequate and then offering to sell them something to relieve the pain of rejection and failure. Americans are hardly ever away from a voice that tells them that they don't measure up to some impossible standard of perfection. The message is like the song, "all in all you're just another brick in the wall" ...unless you buy what the voice is selling.
The sort of Christianity practiced by America's charismatic Christians, both black and white, means that joy can be found for free... this is positively "un-American".
That is why I think that some sort of "liberation theology" is finally going to the only idea or movement that is going to change America. I'm sure that most of the Evangelicals that were attending the Republican convention would be horrified to know that British Socialism has its deepest roots .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_socialism .. in the Baptist and Methodist chapels of Wales and the industrial north of England. But there is no reason to believe that someone who drove the money changers out of the temple is a fan of Ayn Rand's.
I think that America's most deeply rooted institutions are now in conflict with our modern, globalized economy or as Joe Sleeper says:
(...) obeisance to every whim of global capital, which is abandoning Palin's small-town America and Obama's urban America, a capital whose injustices and consumer palliatives are subverting our republican institutions and character.
There has to be found or be created, an overlap between American progressives and the Evangelicals.
There has to be rebellion for anything to happen and the culture of the people has to be taken into account. The lower middle class and poor people of America are religious and we have to start from there. The only strategy that will ever reverse the enormous inequality and the oppression of the poor in the USA is an American version of "Liberation Theology". .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology ..
And remember it is cheap, really cheap, there are over 2000 years of what an MBA would call "sunk costs" working for it.
You don't believe in any of it?
No problem.
If you are truly progressive and want to change the system, then you should say like Henry of Navarre, .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_France .. "Paris vaut bien une messe"... Or study up on "Pascal's Wager". .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager
Like Howard Dean, I believe that America's progressives have to make their peace with evangelical America and find defenders of the "little man" that vibrate in the same cultural key as they do. Where is a contemporary William Jennings Bryan? .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan .. It is absurd that a credible case can be made that the Democrats are elitist, but it is being made effectively every day of the week.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/d/a/david_seaton/2010/09/the-kochs-paying-to-keep-ameri.php?ref=reccafe
Comment: though as a political strategy they do feel to make some sense, i'm not sure if i agree with all the sentiments of the author.
Jonathan Swift said, "May you live all the days of your life!"
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
