InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1184
Posts 134793
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/27/2003

Re: A deleted message

Saturday, 07/31/2010 9:11:12 PM

Saturday, July 31, 2010 9:11:12 PM

Post# of 312014
Considering pyrolysis oil projects main challenges has been quoted as 85-90% of the cost of doing so being the cost of the feedstock, and JBII's cost of feedstock is zero, it doesn't take much analysis to figure out that when you eliminate the cost of something by 85-90% it's probably going to get a profit, especially when some processes are even profitable before the 85-90% cost is taken out.

And notice how everybody has been ignoring the natty gas sales.

With zero cost of feedstock and what sounds like less employees to operate and cheaper hardware than other pyrolysis oil, I'd say the odds of them not being able to figure out how to run it at a profit are zero and not something a reasonable investor would even consider. It's really a question of just how profitable and when. Not if.

The cost of the catalyst, for example, which you think is some big unknown is NOT an unknown. It's peanuts. Do some quality research.

Back to the BBQ...why am I even looking at my stupid phone? lol