InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 19312
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/07/2009

Re: Stratey post# 19040

Tuesday, 07/06/2010 1:48:23 PM

Tuesday, July 06, 2010 1:48:23 PM

Post# of 136088
Well, we know as fact that GLG got shares in return for something, and that something most likely being funding. So there is no doubt about a financial connection between both entities.
There is also nothing bad about securing financing. On the contrary, receiving funding in develpment stage is a document of approval and confidence in the business plan.

So, I would rephrase the question. I would like to know if the connection between GLG and MFLI is that of a "traditional" VC funding relationship which would also include what is at stake to GLG for entering this deal.


- Is GLG a VC firm? If so, do they have rights to management capacity? This is a standard requirement for VC firms and normally be achieved through a seat on the BOD (Sid Dutchak?)

- How much funding did they provide and under which terms

- What is the issuance price of the shares

- Are there loan collaterals in place (secured to assets?)


These questions should be answered in the standard 8-k format.