Followers | 13 |
Posts | 1425 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 06/17/2009 |
Saturday, February 13, 2010 6:22:29 PM
Here is an example of what I found.
Sec. 41-622. Mechanical equipment or appurtenances: Regulations.
(a) All mechanical equipment or appurtenances located on the roof or on the exterior of a building shall be screened.
(b) Every application for a building permit for the development of property shall be submitted to the planning department and shall be accompanied by detailed architectural drawings and plot plans, all to a workable scale, showing the elevation and location of the proposed screening structures or facilities, existing buildings and proposed addition, and any other pertinent information considered appropriate by the applicant or planning director pursuant to this section.
(c) Such plans for the screening shall be submitted to the planning department for approval, conditional approval, or denial. No building permit shall be issued until plans are approved or conditionally approved by the planning department. The decision of the planning department may be appealed to the planning commission and then to the city council.
(d) In order to more clearly define the screening requirement, there shall be on file in the office of the planning department illustrations entitled "Guides to Screening of Mechanical Equipment or Appurtenances." Said illustrations shall be approved by resolution by the planning commission and city council.
(e) No building permit shall be issued for the erection, construction, enlargement, or structural alteration of any building or structure in the city which work exceeds fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area of any existing structures on the property unless the applicant conforms with this section for the entire existing buildings on the legal parcel.
(f) All screening of mechanical equipment or appurtenances on a building shall meet with the approval of the building department.
(g) In all instances where no screening is required, the applicant shall indicate on his plans that this section does not apply to his proposed structure or building.
(Ord. No. NS-1159, § 2, 3-19-73; Ord. No. NS-2710, § 27, 5-1-06)
http://library2.municode.com:80/default-test/template.htm?view=browse&doc_action=setdoc&doc_keytype=tocid&doc_key=9dee0d56c1c4ac7eb86f1f5a1384a0e1&infobase=14452
----------------------------------------------------------
I'm not saying lack of screening is what they've been cited for .. The PBR isn't built yet ... I'm saying I believe they'll need to fulfill the screening requirement.
I need to hear from the company, why they felt they didn't have to submit any plans to the city for the project.
Anyway ..
I hear what you are saying about long weekend, no new info available .. I'll let it rest.. and prepare to gather the remaining details next week. I can call the company on Tues. maybe even monday.. perhaps many shareholders should be calling and leaving messages regarding this .. if it's a non issue, lets squash it.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM