Tornado Alley (PROG)

[F6]

hogsgeteaten -- more hogwash, badly dated at that -- your provenance:

Long Hot Year: Latest Science Debunks Global Warming Hysteria
Cato Policy Analysis No. 329
by Patrick J. Michaels
December 31, 1998
© 1998 The Cato Institute
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-329es.html

(to note -- from now on, when you post such hogwash [or any other content not your own words], please provide the source link -- that's how we do it here)

as already inherently strongly suggested by his having generated the above and other hogwash for Cato, Michaels is an utterly shameless bought-and-paid-for hack, period -- e.g. (items linked in):

Patrick J. Michaels
last modified on 8 January 2010, at 23:41
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_J._Michaels

FACTSHEET: Patrick J. Michaels
(last updated not specified)
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=4

Patrick J. Michaels
(per www.logicalscience.com/search/search.php?zoom_query=patrick+michaels ) last updated 12 Dec 2006
http://www.logicalscience.com/skeptics/patMichaels.html

Patrick Michaels
(last update not specified)
http://www.desmogblog.com/patrick-michaels
(search) http://www.desmogblog.com/search/node/patrick%20michaels

Pat Michaels: scientist, energy industry lackey, Washington Post contributor
May 20, 2004 9:33 am ET
http://mediamatters.org/research/200405200001

RealClimate (searches)
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?s=patrick+michaels&submit=Search&qt=&q=patrick+michaels+site%3Awww.realclimate.org&cx=009744842749537478185%3Ahwbuiarvsbo&client=google-coop-np&cof=GALT%3A808080%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A34374A%3BVLC%3AAA8610%3BAH%3Aleft%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BALC%3A66AA55%3BLC%3A66AA55%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A66A%5C%0D%0AA55%3BGIMP%3A66AA55%3BFORID%3A11%3B&searchdatabase=site
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?s=pat+michaels&qt=&q=pat+michaels+site%3Awww.realclimate.org&cx=009744842749537478185%3Ahwbuiarvsbo&client=google-coop-np&cof=GALT%3A808080%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A34374A%3BVLC%3AAA8610%3BAH%3Aleft%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BALC%3A66AA55%3BLC%3A66AA55%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A66A%5C%0D%0AA55%3BGIMP%3A66AA55%3BFORID%3A11%3B&searchdatabase=site

and see e.g. (items linked in) http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=2765155 (and preceding and following) (current source link at http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=45804957 )

and as for your:

Since the MMGW claims can't be demonstrated without doubt for many years, debate is ongoing and a healthy phenom. The rush to judgement has been to keep the funding coming to departments with their whole stake in MMGW and for politicians to justify more control over where energy and more importantly where money flows.

congratulations -- a literally perfect (blank-stare?) regurgitation of the essential hogwash frame -- http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=16807573

(btw, the acronym is AGW, for Anthropogenic Global Warming)

in sum -- in light of your posting such hogwash, it is entirely self-evident that you are in no position whatsoever to be lecturing anyone else about 'science' or 'truth claims' -- or this topic -- your pious pretense, on this topic anyway, as comical as it is impertinent