InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 1815
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2008

Re: dominator post# 77905

Friday, 01/15/2010 1:33:30 PM

Friday, January 15, 2010 1:33:30 PM

Post# of 118239
Only on the Master Calendar is the information shown.
See here for the link for the master calendar:
http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/crtcal/civil/civ.html
See below for a screen print of the Master Calendar Main displaying info

The actual court case is:
Case CIVRS703175 - RAYMOND CHIN -V- STEPHEN AUST
See below for a screen print of the Master Calendar file.

In order to access San Bernardino Main,
http://170.164.31.10/openaccess/CIVIL/

Note: Inside of the court case once again, all of the original defendants were dropped, leaving just
Aust. However, on the Master Calendar Gene's name as well as RCC Holdings is still showing.
Also, note that there is a countersuit. For months now, a motion to file a dismissal of the
stipulated judgement was to be ruled on. Once again, the matter has been extended.

Finally, I'm not a legal expert, therefore it is my opinion only from a layman's perspective.
We can have the argument/discussion again, but quite frankly I don't care who wins and loses.


Not compensated in any manner for research and/or posts. Information should be construed as information only for discussion purposes. Always conduct your own dd. Just my opinion

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.