Indocan Resources Inc. (IDCN)

[STOCKCHARTER]

IDCN;1-11-2010-PR.L.O.I./Review Indocan Resources Inc. (IDCN)11-12-2009
http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/IDCN
FUNDAMENTALS Market Cap
380.0K
Shares Outstanding-475.0M
Price/Earnings
--x
Revenue (TTM)
--
Earnings per Share
0.00
Dividend + Yield
0.00 (0.00%)
Beta
.4
http://www.cnbc.com/id/34810297/site/14081545
Indocan Resources Executes Letter of Intent With Thunder Bay Group
Press Release Source: Indocan Resources Inc. On Monday January 11, 2010, 3:41 pm EST

NAPLES, Fla., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The Board of Directors of Indocan Resources Inc. (OTC: IDCN) announces today that pursuant to a formal Purchase Agreement an initial agreement has been reached with a Thunder Bay, Ontario group to move forward with aggressive plans for mining gold.

Indocan has agreed to provide capital and other good and valuable considerations in exchange for a full interest in a property known as Hockey Stick, which comprises a collection of mining claims in the Thunder Bay District of NW Ontario.

Indocan's subsidiary, Sierra Cora Ltd. will combine on a 50% - 50% basis with the companies and shareholders known as the Thunder Bay Investors Group. Sierra Cora will fund the operations and plan and float an IPO in the coming months to provide capital and liquidity for the company.

More information can be learned by visiting our website: http://www.indocan.com

We seek "Safe Harbor"
Company Info: [phone] Jeffrey R Bruhjell, president
CONTACT: Investor Relations, Ken Ash [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=45334601&txt2find=idcn
additional share count update;
Posted by: STOCKCHARTER Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010 9:16:17 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 14533

technically speaking idcn share accumulation update: 1.9 billion
i have perused my records and spoken to large shareholders and sub-groups. we even had a large investment group sell around 380m shares over the last few weeks. however we have absorbed this easily. unfortunately for those groups they liquidated their last shares they have held for several years hours before the website update and subsequent pending block buster pr. i thought i should alert this board to quash any thoughts of any fear of dilution. i see where the shares mainly came from. and it is clear to me that there maybe around 400m shares held by 1500+ shareholders. which would equate to around 260k shares on average. we are ready to move steadily higher now. the breakout will occur of course around .0007. all the best stock charter group

ADDING TODAY;1/10-2010 FROM WEBSITE. THIS UPDATE DOES NOT INCLUDE
OIL AND NATURAL GAS PLACEMENT.
PLATINUM - GOLD

We are pressing forward with the gold properties we looked at before the holidays. The first one is known as Hock Stick, a name given by the current leaseholder. The property has quite a history and we are excited to be part of re-exploring this fine set of claims. Work will begin yet this winter with backhoe work daily trenching to the old shaft. Then down-hole for samples!

[-chart]www.indocan.com/images/350_Gold_Bar_Pile.jpg[-/chart]
The recent sampling at Hockey Stick using grab samples and shallow trenching yielded a filed (with the Ontario government) result of 1.34 ounces Au (Gold) per metric tonne.
HOCKEY STICK;

HOCKEY STICK;
[-chart]www.indocan.com/images/320_Hockey_Stick_Map.JPG[-/chart]

Property 2 - (Coming Soon)
Property 3 - (Coming Soon)

GLOBAL WARMING; SOLAR THOUGHTS FOR IDCN?

GLOBAL WARMING;
[-chart]www.indocan.com/images/600_Photosynth.JPG[-/chart]
Gold in Ontario. The Thunder Bay District is our quest. Fine gold mining claims packaged well by experienced prospectors. We have a full interest with a locally-based company to exploit the goldmines that have been productive, excellent examples of NW Ontario Gold Mining.

SECONDARY Copper and Silver (Cu & Ag)
DEVELOPMENT, HISTORY AND OWNERSHIP
PAST

1946: Neil Smith (Neil Prospecting Syndicate) Nezah, Ontario found gold and staked claimsincluding what later became TB113679 covering the No. l vein.

1947: Green Lake Gold Mines conducted trenching and diamond drilling (21 diamond drill holes).

1958-1960: Chellew Gold Mines acquired property. Martin-Sturgeon Syndicate optioned the ground from Chellew Gold Mines Limited and conducted trenching, stripping, sampling and diamond drilling (20 holes totaling 1,940 m (6,366 feet) X

196?: Walter Brown optioned the ground and diamond drilled. The claims lapsed.

1964: T. Christiansen restaked the property and held claims TB113679, TB113704, TB113705,TB117988, TB117989 and TB117990.1965: Bulk sampling was done by Christiansen.

1966: T. Christiansen and G. W. Moore entered into an agreement.TB113679 was brought to lease.

1966-1967: Crooked Green Creek Mine Limited drove an inclined shaft 7 feet (2.1 m) x 9 feet(2.7 m). The shaft was sunk 45 0 to 38 feet (11.6 m). Diamond drilling and sampling were completed.CURRENT The company held claims TB113679, TB113704, TB117988 to 117990 inclusive, TB119535 to 119541 inclusive, TB124392 to TB124409 inclusive, TB34902, TB340905, TB34908.

1972: Sol and Ben Cowan (Algoma Development Co.)acquired the property, less 6 claims,TB34902, TB34905, TB34908, TB602243, TB602244, TB602245, now held by Hillsborough Exploration Limited.

1981: The name was changed to Northern Concentrators. The company has conducted seasonal smallscale mining to the present day. A mill rated at 25 tons per day was constructed in Thunder Bay to handle the ore.

1983: The Thunder Bay Joint Venture, comprised of Great Western Petroleum Corporation andAnglo-Canadian Mining Corporation, optioned 29 staked claims and l leased claim fromNorthern Concentrators Limited. Three staked and three leased claims were optioned from Hillsborough Exploration Limited.

1984: Bulk sampling was initiated as part of the Thunder Bay Joint Venture-Cowan-Hi llsborough agreement. Northern Concentrators 1 custom mill in Thunder Bay, has milled 327 tons of gold ore from the Crooked Green Creek #2 zone on the Pifher Township property. An additional213 tons of ore was mined (all from the #2 zone) and trucked to Teck Corporation's custom mill facility.

1985: Diamond drilling commenced on No. 2 zone. Hillsborough option only retained.Northern Concentrators Limited milled approximately 200 tons from the CrookedGreen Creek #2 Zone (B. Doucet, Mill Manager, Northern Concentrators Mill, Thunder Bay, personal communication, 1985)

Geology Report (Link)

It appears that claim 4226069 hosts the open cut from which a bulk sample was extracted in 1984 on the No. 2 zone. The shaft itself is located to the north, near the end of the road on the leased claim TB 113679. The property was written up by Gerry and John Mason in their Open File report, which is available as a free, downloadable .pdf at the Left

Main Office:
2809 Great Northern Loop, Suite 100
Missoula, Montana 59808-1749
Tel. [phone]

Jeffrey R. Bruhjell, president
[e-mail]

http://www.indocan.com

The Company Info tab on the Pink Sheets website has been updated to reflect our materially reduced float of public shares.

Company Info;
We are still dealing with Canadian gold properties. They are entering a long weekend for Thanksgiving on Oct. 12th. After that we should execute and announce a nice gold prospect.


excerpt from;
LONDON, October 20, 2009 -- Hess Chairman and CEO John Hess was among the featured speakers at this week’s 2009 Oil & Money industry summit – an annual conference where the world’s most influential decision makers meet to examine issues that are shaping the international oil and gas industries.

This year’s conference, held at the InterContinental London Park Lane, was themed Strategies for Turbulent Times. It included discussions of the geopolitics of oil, oil forecasting, capacity, and the implications of a new carbon policy around the world.

Mr. Hess told the audience that “good environmental policy and good energy policy are not the same. We need both for sustainable development.

“We need new models of collaboration. We need to redefine the nature of our public-private partnerships when it comes to investment in developing oil resources.” Hess called on the United States to lead consuming nations in the conservation of energy and OPEC to lead producing nations in building oil production capacity.

His speech was well received, particularly the suggestion that people around the world need to take a sober, factual look at the environmental and energy policies that will shape the world in years to come.

Among those joining Mr. Hess were Christophe de Margerie, CEO of Total, who was named 2009 Petroleum Executive of the Year at this year’s conference; Tony Hayward, group chief executive, BP; H.E. Abdalla Salem El-Badri, secretary general, OPEC; Paolo Scaroni, CEO, Eni S.p.A.; James J. Mulva, chairman and CEO, ConocoPhillips; H.E. Dr. Rilwanu Lukman, minister, Petroleum Resources, Nigeria; and, Jakob Thomasen, CEO, Maersk Oil.

Participants included economists, oil ministers, bankers, authors, researchers and representatives from each of the leading energy companies around the world.

Mr. Hess spoke on the afternoon of the second day. The full text of his speech follows:

'OIL AND THE FUTURE'
Oil & Money Conference
October 20, 2009
London

In my country, the United States, there is a major political initiative to address climate change – and rightfully so. We need to put a price on carbon to have a transparent allocation of resources to reduce our carbon footprint. Many politicians believe that the proposed legislation to address this problem is an energy policy. It is not. The problem is that good environmental policy and good energy policy are not the same. People confuse the two. We need both for sustainable development.

The approaches of both consumers and producers are based on hope, but what we need is a sober reality. The reality is that an oil crisis is coming that could prove devastating to future economic growth. Given the long lead times of 5-to-10 years from oil discovery to production, we need to act now to avert this outcome. I would like to suggest a framework of three "C's" to address this threat: communication, courage and collaboration.

LONDON, October 20, 2009 -- Hess Chairman and CEO John Hess was among the featured speakers at this week’s 2009 Oil & Money industry summit – an annual conference where the world’s most influential decision makers meet to examine issues that are shaping the international oil and gas industries.

This year’s conference, held at the InterContinental London Park Lane, was themed Strategies for Turbulent Times. It included discussions of the geopolitics of oil, oil forecasting, capacity, and the implications of a new carbon policy around the world.

Mr. Hess told the audience that “good environmental policy and good energy policy are not the same. We need both for sustainable development.

“We need new models of collaboration. We need to redefine the nature of our public-private partnerships when it comes to investment in developing oil resources.” Hess called on the United States to lead consuming nations in the conservation of energy and OPEC to lead producing nations in building oil production capacity.

His speech was well received, particularly the suggestion that people around the world need to take a sober, factual look at the environmental and energy policies that will shape the world in years to come.

Among those joining Mr. Hess were Christophe de Margerie, CEO of Total, who was named 2009 Petroleum Executive of the Year at this year’s conference; Tony Hayward, group chief executive, BP; H.E. Abdalla Salem El-Badri, secretary general, OPEC; Paolo Scaroni, CEO, Eni S.p.A.; James J. Mulva, chairman and CEO, ConocoPhillips; H.E. Dr. Rilwanu Lukman, minister, Petroleum Resources, Nigeria; and, Jakob Thomasen, CEO, Maersk Oil.

Participants included economists, oil ministers, bankers, authors, researchers and representatives from each of the leading energy companies around the world.

Mr. Hess spoke on the afternoon of the second day. The full text of his speech follows:

'OIL AND THE FUTURE';Oil & Money Conference
October 20, 2009
London

Introduction
By way of introduction, I am fortunate to be the Chairman and CEO of Hess Corporation, founded 76 years ago by my father, who started out driving a truck making deliveries of home heating oil to customers in the New York metropolitan area. The company has since grown into a global vertically-integrated business that is led by Exploration & Production, with reserves evenly distributed between the United States, Europe, Africa and Asia. We face exciting challenges as we explore for resources in offshore deepwater provinces and onshore in unconventional shale formations. Our strategy is to build a company that sustains long term profitable growth while making a positive impact on the communities where we do business. In doing so, we compete and partner with international oil companies and national oil companies around the world.

My remarks today will cover "Oil and the Future." Today, our industry is at a crossroads. Oil has moved to a demand-led market where supply is struggling to keep pace. The financial crisis of the past year has reduced demand by 2 million barrels per day, creating excess inventories and lower prices. While this setback has brought us some welcome breathing room, I believe that it is only temporary. Once economic growth recovers, it is likely we will return to the market conditions of one year ago. The price of $140 per barrel oil was not an aberration; it was a warning.

Over the past several years, many people in our business have expressed confidence that we were up to meeting the challenges ahead. From the producer perspective, it has been suggested that the remaining global endowment of up to 3 trillion barrels of recoverable oil meant that we should not be concerned with a prospect of shortages. Higher prices, advancing technology and sound government policies would enable supply to keep up with demand. Consuming nations viewed these issues quite differently, criticizing producers for rising prices, blaming oil for climate change and implementing policies to develop alternatives to hydrocarbons. I would suggest there is a major disconnect between consumers and producers.

In my country, the United States, there is a major political initiative to address climate change – and rightfully so. We need to put a price on carbon to have a transparent allocation of resources to reduce our carbon footprint. Many politicians believe that the proposed legislation to address this problem is an energy policy. It is not. The problem is that good environmental policy and good energy policy are not the same. People confuse the two. We need both for sustainable development.

The approaches of both consumers and producers are based on hope, but what we need is a sober reality. The reality is that an oil crisis is coming that could prove devastating to future economic growth. Given the long lead times of 5-to-10 years from oil discovery to production, we need to act now to avert this outcome. I would like to suggest a framework of three "C's" to address this threat: communication, courage and collaboration.

Let me take a moment to elaborate on each of these points.

Communication
The first C, communication, means we must communicate the facts about supply and demand in the oil industry and build a common understanding among the citizens of the world. Only when we have that understanding among both consumers and producers can we arrive at a comprehensive approach to attaining an affordable and secure energy supply to sustain economic growth.

When my good friend Nick Brady was Secretary of the Treasury in the United States, he sometimes referred to the need for "Truth Serum." Faced with an impending debt crisis during his tenure at Treasury when many countries were on the verge of bankruptcy, Nick instructed his team to assemble a common set of facts as their first order of business. Nick, who is a Director of our corporation, was an outstanding world leader whose decisions saved many countries from financial collapse. He knew that good facts lead to good policy; bad facts lead to bad policy. In the interest of creating good energy policy, let us offer Truth Serum and establish the facts.

Fact No. 1: Hydrocarbons. Eighty-five percent of the world’s energy comes from hydrocarbons: 35 percent oil, 30 percent coal and 20 percent natural gas. While renewable energy will be needed and should be encouraged to meet future energy demand and contribute to reducing our carbon footprint, hydrocarbons will fuel the world’s economy for decades to come – and oil will continue to be at the forefront. Renewable energy does not have the scale, timeframe or economics to materially change this outcome.

Fact No. 2: Oil demand. Once the economy recovers, it is projected to increase by 1 million barrels per day each year. A key driver is world population, estimated to grow from 6.8 billion today to 9 billion by 2050, largely in the developing countries of the world. With a corresponding increase in living standards, hydrocarbon energy, led by oil, will be needed to support economic development. The other driver of demand growth is transportation, which accounts for fifty percent of oil consumption. The gasoline automotive engine is very inefficient; according to the United States Department of Energy, only 15 percent of the fuel is converted to useful energy. The introduction of higher mileage standards in the U.S. and the gradual phasing in of electrical power into automotive drive trains will only moderate growth in automotive fuel demand. That is because nearly one billion vehicles on the road today could grow to approximately two billion vehicles in the next 30 years. An interesting statistic to keep in mind: The U.S. has 1000 cars for every 1000 people; China has 10 cars per 1000. As China closes that gap, growth in oil demand will be relentless.

Fact. No. 3: Oil supply. We are not running out of oil. We have produced 1 trillion barrels so far and estimates are that we have about 3 trillion barrels remaining to recover – 2 trillion barrels of conventional resources and 1 trillion barrels unconventional, such as tar sands and heavy oil. The issue is not our endowment of oil resources. It is the world’s production capacity. Resource additions from exploration last replaced annual production in 1987. Part of the challenge going forward is that the easiest oil to access has been discovered. Costs are increasing for new barrels as producers explore frontiers such as the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and Brazil, where wells can be drilled in water depths of over one mile to targets up to six miles deep, and discoveries can take over a decade to develop.

Oil field declines are estimated at more than 5 percent per year. That means we have to add at least 4 million barrels per day each year just to keep production flat. When you add this number to the 1 million barrels per day required to meet demand growth, we need an extra 5 million barrels per day each year going forward. Yet non-OPEC production is in the process of, if not peaking, reaching a plateau. Also, 73 percent of the countries that produce oil have already peaked. In fact, the U.K. Energy Research Centre just published a report that there is a significant risk that worldwide production of conventional oil could peak before 2020 and enter terminal decline.

OPEC has about 45 percent of the world’s oil production but 76 percent of the remaining reserves. Since we need more production capacity to meet the world’s increased need for oil, OPEC will be called upon to play an even greater role in the future. Saudi Arabia and some OPEC countries are to be commended for their recent significant investments to increase their production capacity. We will need it – and more.

Given these facts, we need to communicate the following message:

(1) Hydrocarbons are here to stay.
(2) Oil demand growth will be unrelenting, increasing 1 million barrels per day each year.
(3) We are not running out of oil but growth of production capacity over the next several years will fall short of the incremental 5 million barrels per day each year that we will need to meet demand.

(4) We will ultimately be at risk of supply rationing demand through skyrocketing prices that will threaten economic stability and prosperity. If we do not act now, we will have a devastating oil crisis in the next 5-to-10 years.

As the global system gets increasingly stressed over competition for resources, there is more and more protectionism among consuming nations and resource nationalism among producing countries. The narrow interest of national protectionism is threatening our global future. The U.S. will say: “We need to wean ourselves off of foreign oil.” Producing countries will say: “With all the confusing signals we are getting, we no longer have the long-term demand to build production capacity.” Energy policy among nations of the world is anything but aligned. Nations are building walls to disengage from one another when they should be building bridges to collaborate. We need to put global needs first.

Going forward, we need new models of collaboration. First, we need to redefine the nature of our public-private partnerships when it comes to investment in developing oil resources. Over many decades, international oil companies and producing countries have worked together in a way that has been purely financial – through contracts that are either tax and royalty or production sharing. In the future, we need to build stronger bonds of trust. The investment model needs to be focused not only on oil resources but building the capabilities of host country’s human resources. Many oil producing countries have critical needs in education and health. Many international oil companies have access to organizations that are well qualified to assist in these areas. If we redefine the value proposition for not just leaving a financial legacy but a social legacy, we will all be better off. It is the old adage: “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” We must redefine what it means to get a return on investment. It is not just profitability, but the development of the human capital of the country where you are doing business.

Second, we also need one global forum dedicated to governments working together to set energy policy. Without a common framework on energy, sustainable economic development will be impossible. While there are numerous collaborative initiatives – IEA for consumers, OPEC for producers, as well as others – we do not have one comprehensive forum that meets on a consistent basis to develop global energy policy. I would suggest this challenge for the G-20, which was formed a decade ago in response to global financial crises. Its membership includes 19 nations and the European Union. These nations represent six of the seven biggest oil producers and the 14 largest oil consumers. Its mission is sustainable economic growth. Energy not only fits this objective, it is essential for its success. It is laudable that energy subsidies were included on their last agenda, but that is not enough. Energy should be on their agenda at every meeting.

In an environment that my friend Fareed Zakaria refers to as “the post-American world,” no one nation is in a position to dictate; we need to collaborate. The U.S. has to take the lead so that other countries – both consumers and producers -- will do their fair share.

Conclusion;
In conclusion, I come back to the title of my remarks today, “Oil and the Future.” What kind of world do we want to leave to our children? If we do nothing, there will be severe consequences. In a world of mutually reinforcing fears, the competition for scarce oil resources will inevitably lead to supply-driven price shocks. Last year’s skyrocketing prices would become a way of life in a crisis-led world that threatens economic sustainability.

However, if we follow the three “C’s”, what might the future hold? In a world where we all make concessions and put global interests first, we will all win. If consuming nations led by the United States commit to conserving energy through new automotive and building efficiency standards, we could save over 5 million barrels per day of incremental demand over the next 10 years. If producing nations led by OPEC commit to building more oil production capacity, we would add over 5 million barrels per day of incremental supply over the next 10 years. In this world, prices would be stable and our global economy could prosper. Does this scenario sound impossible? I do not think so.

The stakes have never been higher. We must build a balanced and comprehensive approach to energy security and protection of the environment to ensure sustainable development. We must unite and work together as an industry, communicating one message, having the courage to act and collaborating for the global good. In this world, there will be a bright future, not only for oil, but for many generations to come.

Investor Relations: Please call or write for our latest updates:
http://www.indocan.com/investors
Quote: IDCN
Company Offices - [phone] - [e-mail]
Investor Relations Officer - Ken Ash - +1.910.300.8189
Email Ken - 1.910.300.8189

==============================================================
http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=idcn

The Company Info tab on the Pink Sheets website has been updated to reflect our materially reduced float of public shares.

Business Description
Indocan Resources is a junior mining company with interests in Canada and the USA.

the above use to read oil and natural gas?

Company Officers
Jeffrey R Bruhjell, President, CFO
Angela Harrison, Secretary
Ken Ash, IR

Number of Employees
2 as of Jul 23, 2008
SEC Reporting Status
non-SEC Reporting Company
CIK
0001364434
Fiscal Year End
12/31
Estimated Market Cap
$1,284,181 as of Oct 12, 2009
Outstanding Shares
4,280,604,662 as of Oct 8, 2009
Authorized Shares
4,980,000,000 as of Oct 8, 2009
Float(shares)
2,284,357,269 as of Oct 8, 2009
Number of Shareholders of Record
1,243 as of Oct 8, 2009

ME;
THE ABOVE SHARE COUNT IS OR SEEMS TO BE ABOUT ON TARGET.
1 BILLION SHARES HAVE BEEN JUST IN A FOLDER AND CAN NOT BE TRADED
ANY LONGER.
1 GROUP SEMMS TO OWN 1.8 BILLION WITH OTHER OWNING OVER
500MIL. SHARES.
ESTIMATED FLOAT IS AROUND 540 MIL.

FINANCING IS BEING CHATTED ABOUT AND BEEN IN CHAT FOR SEVERAL MONTHS.

THERE CAN NOT BE ANY DILUTION DUE TO AGREEMENTS WITH MGMT AND
KEN ASH.

http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=idcn
Business Description
Indocan Resources is a junior mining company with interests in Canada and the USA.

Company Notes
Note=4-08 State of Incorporation Nevada changed to Montana
Formerly=H-L Corp. until 3-
Transfer Agent
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
17 Battery Place, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10004

Legal Counsel
Bjornson Law Offices
2809 Great Northern Loop
Suite 100
Missoula, MT 59808
===============================================================
http://quote.barchart.com/quote.asp?sym=%20idcn&code=BSTK
techs; http://quote.barchart.com/techrept.asp?sym=IDCN
opinion; http://quote.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=IDCN
snapshot; http://quote.barchart.com/texsnap.asp?sym=IDCN
advance techs; http://quote.barchart.com/texadv.asp?sym=IDCN
performance; http://quote.barchart.com/performance.asp?sym=IDCN
projection; http://charts3.barchart.com/procal.asp?sym=IDCN

[-chart]charts3.barchart.com/custom/tc/IDCN.GIF[-/chart]
Chart; http://charts3.barchart.com/chart.asp?sym=IDCN&data=A&jav=adv&vol=Y&divd=Y&evnt=adv&grid=Y&code=BSTK&org=stk&fix=
==============================================================
5MA---10MA---20MA PPO---ADX---TRIX---VOLUME


5MA---10MA---20MA PPO---ADX---TRIX---VOLUME
[-chart]stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=idcn&p=D&yr=0&mn=3&dy=0&i=p78292400264&r=8528[-/chart]

20 50 200MA,,,VOLUME - PPO - CMF - SLO STO % PRICES.


20 50 200MA,,,VOLUME - PPO - CMF - SLO STO % PRICES.
[-chart]stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=idcn&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=0&i=p45212469049&r=6823[-/chart]

1-a --- five day chart; volume, 50ma --- 100ma --- trix --- rsi --- macd 07/14/2009 large candles!
template;


1-a --- five day chart; volume, 50ma --- 100ma --- trix --- rsi --- macd 07/14/2009 large candles!
template;
[-chart]stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=idcn&p=60&yr=0&mn=0&dy=5&i=p60666344679&r=7219[-/chart]

HISTORICAL: 3yr. 50-200ma...RSI - MACD - CMF - PRICES - VOLUME - BLACK BACKGROUND.


HISTORICAL: 3yr. 50-200ma...RSI - MACD - CMF - PRICES - VOLUME - BLACK BACKGROUND.
[-chart]stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=idcn&p=W&yr=3&mn=0&dy=0&i=p22053646375&r=[-/chart]

DISCLAIMER - Nothing in the contents transmitted on this board should be construed as an investment advisory, nor should it be used to make investment decisions. There is no express or implied solicitation to buy or sell securities. The author(s) may have positions in the stocks discussed and may trade in the stocks mentioned. Readers are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to considering buying or selling any stock. All information should be considered for information purposes only.

ENJOY TO ALL...DA MICK!

Here is the url for a 59 month CBAI weekly chart at BigCharts:
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?symb=idcn

10yr, Chart
[-chart]charting.nasdaq.com/ext/charts.dll?2-1-14-0-0-5120-03NA000000Cidcn-&SF:1|39|38|8|27-SH:8=20|27=10-WD=539-HT=395-[-/chart]

File Msg | Remove Msg | *Private* Reply

Block mick's Private Messages Add mick to Favorites


Advanced Search Browse By Category
© 2010 InvestorsHub.Com, Inc.
About Us | User Agreement | Contact Us | Handbook | FAQ | Advertising | Investor Education | New Stuff Blog
You are STOCKCHARTER on WEB3