InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 752
Posts 59183
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 08/06/2009

Re: None

Thursday, 11/26/2009 11:47:41 PM

Thursday, November 26, 2009 11:47:41 PM

Post# of 135318
Evenin all,

I just received a response from Mr. Perlowin on my query from this am...man this guy is fast in responding...he probably hopes I will get this out before opening bell, and waddaya know, he was correct!

I am posting my email to him and his rsponse back. Great night everyone!


From:
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 6:03 AM
To: bruce@medicalmarijuanainc.com
Subject: RE: Inquiry



Dear Mr. Perlowin,

First off, Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours. Secondly, thank you so much for the rapid and very candid response. Based on your openness in this email, I cannot imagine that another individual hasn't already written you and gotten this word out to the masses! I am relatively new to this emerging market and with the three entities that I have surmised are on the forefront of this thing, MJNA, HESG and CBIS.
Thank you also on being so transparent about your own history, of which I personally do not judge as I had dabbled in my own related activities as a younger man....and always held the notion that one day this substance would become legalized to some extent, and here we are! This is a great period in American history to be alive indeed.
I completely understand your not issuing a PR on this matter as it does seem redundant. I think there has been some skepticim on this area as it is known that some less-than-legit practices do occur involving larger companies receiving payment from struggling companies to utilize their names in false PR's etc. So your response to me puts that to rest.
I also completely understand why you eschew the PR's until the ink on the contract has dried, and in my humble opinion, within this realm of the corporate world, I honestly agree in waiting until the deal is done before PR'ing the endeavor. I say this because I have observed that often such "fluff" PR's issued prior to a deal being closed often work to lower the share price in a struggling company, or in your case, spark frustration and useless speculation among investors. In other words, why tease us with "intentions" and "plans" etc. rather than simply giving us the meat as it were. Sorry for the pontification...just wanted to share that.
Finally, another investor brought up a cogent question that as I now have your ear, I would like to pose to you. That is, what does HESG have to offer your establishment that would make it a suitable candidate for a merger?
In any case, I think you have convinced me to join team MJNA, and to fortify my position in HESG! Your openness is refreshing, and your style of communication is admirable!
Have a great turkey day!

Best,




Hey Chris,



It’s simple - on one level – what HESG offers me is the experience of Thomas Gaffney. Like he said to me, “I know stocks like you know marijuana, I’ve been doing stocks for 25 years”. While I do have partners, attorneys, advisors, etc. in the public company arena – I like Thomas Gaffney’s skill set in this area and it does create a synergistic relationship with my skill sets – so I think this is a formula for an win-win situation. One certainly can’t argue with the recent action in his stock movement once the press releases went out – he knows his stuff – we know ours - and I look forward to working with him now and in the future.



Thanks, Bruce Perlowin


Thoughts anyone??