InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 42446
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: whizzeresq post# 267314

Sunday, 08/16/2009 2:07:02 PM

Sunday, August 16, 2009 2:07:02 PM

Post# of 432690
Thanks whizzer.

I was fooled by the language of IDCC 10-K. It did not mentioned the Court of Appeal. I should have accounted for the Court of Appeal.

There is also something else for IDCC investors to keep in mind.

The ALJ decision only effected those Nokia products in the complaint. I think IDCC could take Nokia again to the ITC if Nokia introduces a new product and IDCC determines that product infringes one of the 4 patents. Judge Luckern determined that all 4 IDCC patents are valid.

Also just because the Judge determined that Nokia did not infringe, it does not mean he or another judge would come to same conclusion for another manufacturer products.

i.e. I think if IDCC files another complaint, IDCC will make sure that the product uses a half rate convolutional encoder.

mo
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News