InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 14045
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/27/2008

Re: None

Tuesday, 12/09/2008 3:59:43 PM

Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:59:43 PM

Post# of 165857
Zone B Niobium vs. Radiation Counts

Looking again at the old Dominion Gulf drill logs today:
http://www.sarissaresources.com/media/Gulf_Drill_Logs.pdf

Page 7, 8 and 9 of the document shows the Dominion Gulf mapping and drill holes with results. The map on page 7 lays out the mineral names in sequences, some of which might be familiar, along with dispositions of the drill cores and the results of them. Page 8 shows the results in tabular form, and then page 9 combines the tabular data and the mineral sequences. What it seems it shows is a reasonable correlation in zone B between radiation counts and niobium... with counts of 75 correlated to .4% or .5% columbium as Cb2O5.

Page 41 shows a nice drill core intersection in hole 17 with higher rad counts around 70 correlated to Cb2O5 around .7% over 50 feet...

Page 64 shows a map with hole 10 cutting through the center of zone D, hole 11 at the east end of zone D. Hole 10 is described on pages 70 to 75. Hole 11 from page 76 to page 81. They describe cutting through some smaller sections of higher radiation counts, up over 100 to 140 over good widths in hole 10.

Interesting stuff. The data they left is specific and very descriptive, and with the holes being well mapped, it should allow assembling a pretty good and reasonably specific map of the local geology... looking like they have cores in zone D that are intersecting sections of the "good stuff" that are more closely associated with the source materials... much higher radiation counts... Should be very interesting to see if the current effort allows mapping the directional elements of flow, etc., which might point toward where the stuff came from...