InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 109
Posts 8813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/03/2004

Re: IQ1 post# 258101

Wednesday, 09/03/2008 11:50:03 AM

Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:50:03 AM

Post# of 358426
IQ1 _ here is what ETGMF thinks about the Uranium claims from CMKM:


On June 30th, 2007, United Uranium Corp. extended a July 1, 2007 $300,000 payment deadline, to be paid by
the Company, until September 15, 2007. No summer or fall 2007 work program was proposed by United
Uranium Corp. so the Company decided that the scant uranium values of two previous abbreviated drill
programs (7 ½ drill holes over two years) did not warrant the $300,000 payment and the Company abandoned
the Hatchet Lake Uranium prospect.


http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/jacRcdh





And after ETGMF abandoned the property, United Uranium ended up doing JV with another company.


In March 2008 the Company entered into an agreement with Denison Mines Corp.
regarding the Hatchet Lake property. Under the terms of the agreement, United Uranium
has granted Denison Mines the right to earn a 50% interest in the property in
consideration of the following work commitments by Denison:


http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/qadccdi




Of course _ all is IMO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.