InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 16360
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 04/24/2000

Re: jorjenzak post# 32

Tuesday, 08/22/2000 10:19:26 PM

Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:19:26 PM

Post# of 82595
jorjenzak,

I think you have the right idea: Will reevaluate after Oct. IVRT posted a response today regarding the news that made a lot of sense to me. He stated that today's PR was to draw the industry's attention. You know, there is a lot to that. While DNAP needs to be congnizant of its shareholders, its main goal is to build its business. And the only way it can do that is to intice others in the industry to take a stake in DNAP. And to do that, it needs to keep the world apprised of its progress no matter how technical it is to the shareholders. Everyone expects PRs to provide a litany or cluster of contracts and instant cash flow statements without having a clue as to what the company does or provides. I admit it. This stuff is way over my head and I have a medical background! I am, however, smart enough to know that this stuff is the future. Whether DNAP is one of the players remains to be seen. I'm betting on it for now...:)
Theowink
P.S. Please forgive any spelling errors- MATT! we need spell-check pleeze....:)


Theo ;-)