Blue Fin, You humor me. Whether or not he is out of office does not mean the decisions of his first seven years are at the broad brush of your personal hisrotical perrogative excluded from historical analysis. The clock of the processing the decision making abilities does not begin with their exit from said role. Just want to make sure the proposition you make is clearly understood.
Let's see, by your own logic Steven Sprague's decision making can not be scrutinized until he leaves his position of authority. Are you sure you want to go there? Or are you so far down the road on the right that you are failing to see that scholars have already judged it's current leader as a dismal failure. Easy for you to discredit their analysis(all 336 historians at once!), you've done it at least twice tonight by my count. But if as a young kitten you keep your eyes and thinking process closed to alternative realities until November, I am truly afraid you'll wake up to find a demaocrat as your next president and in an amazingly startled voice yell out "how the hell did that happen"?
Please do stop by for a polite and brief "we told you so" session. I am quite sure our leading historian (going fishin) will provide you with plenty of reading material for which to come to an understanding of why the rest of this country of ours has rejected your premises.
Until then, by all means keep on humoring me, it helps to pass yet another god forsaken midwestern late season snow storm from.....
Keeler
