InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2922
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: stockprofitter post# 790021

Tuesday, 03/26/2024 3:09:51 AM

Tuesday, March 26, 2024 3:09:51 AM

Post# of 794472
The lobbyist Bill Ackman and the Fannie_Mae CEO have been caught in, yet again, another conspiracy in the same week, just when the Democrats and Republicans were negotiating the Federal Budget.
But two posters received orders to say that the Pershing's letter was published on March 25, when it occurred on March 22, to not show that both were colluding with the same pitch the same week.
Hey, navy! Are you also writing with Nsfraudbuster over on stocktwits?
You bet!

It isn't just a flawed opinion. One of them is responsible for the Financial Statement fraud they are basing their opinion on: All the SPS LP increased for free as compensation to Treasury since the December 2017 4th PA amendment, and its corresponding offset with reduction of Retained Earnings account (Core Capital), are missing on the Balance Sheets.

The comment about the two interviews to the CEO of Fannie Mae last week, appears in one of the tweets cited below.
Both with the same song:
-FnF continue to build capital through retained earnings. FALSE.
-FnF hold x dollars in capital, referring to Capital Reserve, not the capital available in the ERCF: Total Captial, Core Capital, CET1 or T1 Capital. FALSE. Besides an invalid capital metric in the FHEFSSA, the actual Capital Reserve is $0, once the SPS LP increased for free and its offset, are posted on the balance sheets to solve the current Financial Statement fraud.

Finally, Bill Ackman in his letter praises the CEOs of FnF to later assert:

whom we have never met


Why did he feel the need to say it? They could have met with Pagliara or Timothy Howard through Tik-Tok, like their daily Morning meetings with the Fanniegate social media crew: Bradford, Rum boat tommater, Guido, John Carney, former DOJ's Mooppan, plaintiff Joshua Angel, plaintiff Bryndon Fisher, etc.
Also he felt the need to highlight that:

Both companies remain wards of the state.


This is false, because the control over the enterprises is held by the conservator, not by the Federal Government, which happens to be the FHFA since Calabria's HERA struck down the prior option in the FHEFSSA, where anyone could be conservator of FnF.
FHFA, as conservator, has limited powers and "not subject to any other Federal Agency". Any action "authorized by this section" and "may" doesn't mean it's excused from complying.


Even FHFA as regulator, due to the Charter Act and the FHEFSSA (For instance, this is why it's been requested a refund of the CRT expenses, net. Operations barred in the Credit Enhancement clause. Only the UST can carry out CRT operations with its Capital Magnet Fund (35% of the 4.2 bps on new acquisitions, sent by FnF quarterly), with the amendment inserted by HERA into the FHEFSSA. Source)
A Federal Agency established as an independent agency of the Federal Government. Nothing changed with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Clearly this message was sent to representative Maxine Waters, the only person that has said "Federal Government conservatorship" (here), also repeated by Guido (Pagliara's clerk) one day, to the same end.

The lobbyists and special interest groups are having way too much influence over the enterprises, besides the FHFA, contravening the FHEFSSA section CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS:

FHFA should have sufficient autonomy from the enterprises (during a 15-year conservatorship?) and special interest groups. Source.


In-depth analysis: