InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 24247
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/23/2016

Re: A deleted message

Sunday, 08/05/2018 9:13:59 AM

Sunday, August 05, 2018 9:13:59 AM

Post# of 467628
OFP,

Not that it matters, but I did not have to pay $40 for access to the full paper.

You may have noticed that the paper is broadly spilt into two sections discussing the compounds in physiological (normal) and pathological (disease) conditions.

In short I do believe the ineffectiveness of A2-73 is only referring to physiological conditions in which one wants the compound to be inactive. Whereas, A2-73 is effective, and more so than other SR1 antagonist mentioned, in pathological conditions, which is where you want to antagonise SR1 along with its Allosteric modulation of e.g. of M1.

The Missling Firetruck analogy that only leaves the fire station to do its work when there is a fire.

It would be rather odd for Tangui Maurice, who is an Anavex SAB member and proponent of A2-73, to write an entire paper concluding that A2-73 is the most ineffective compound.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News