InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12973
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: beesknees1 post# 45402

Saturday, 12/16/2017 1:46:41 AM

Saturday, December 16, 2017 1:46:41 AM

Post# of 133085
"half" of what? You yourself said hundreds of billions. You think they're gonna settle for half of something like that? I don't. Plus maybe they still think they have enough to either beat vplm or wear them down financially. Thst IS their MO after all. It was recently said here, when I asked, that apple has not actually paid out much in all of their infringement cases against them (I think there's many). Yes, I get it about the sweep, but that's only 2 for Apple. They are very important, but I have the feeling that apple has plenty more maneuverings to use. I guess we'll find out soon if they're gonna settle. They might, but my guess is no. I've been saying for years that companies like apple & all the other big dogs (and the lesser dogs) would've thoroughly researched these patents long ago, thus they would've known for sure, via their lawyers & scientists, if the patents were all that & if so, same question you asked....why would they not have launched a pre-emptive strike long ago, or one of the other companies would've. It makes sense. They would've put a stop to the INEVITABLE sooner than later since they ALSO knew how the monies due would be climbing exponentially. Of course now there's a seemingly flaw in my theory, the IPR wins, but I cannot help but not be convinced apple will settle or any if the others (unless they lose their nerve). Anyway, soon perhaps, we'll will have "THE REST OF THE STORY".
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News