Thursday, December 14, 2017 4:30:16 PM
Since Treasury is not allowed to own shares, that would mean they could NEVER exercise the warrants. For Treasury to sell their shares, they first have to exercise the warrants which means they would be in VIOLATION of owning shares, even if only for a millisecond. If Treasury sells their shares, they would ripen plaintiffs takings claim in Judge Lamberth's court. Judge Lamberth dismissed the case because, as he stated, the plaintiff claims were not yet ripe, a taking had not yet occurred.
Treasury's only option, IMO, is to elect not to exercise warrants in the first place thereby never owning shares. Treasury's intent from the outset was never to sell the shares, but rather to drive the pps down toward zero.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM