InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 5716
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2005

Re: es1 post# 162660

Tuesday, 12/12/2017 3:16:42 PM

Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:16:42 PM

Post# of 165855
Yes, you are wrong, there was Shining Tree with no asset value proven and no shareholder value generated. the proposal was to give the asset to Currah in lieu of his made up debt. Shareholders would have gotten nothing so regardless there is some value should the property be developed, none if it were given to Currah

As to the rest of your tirade at this point doesn't matter as long as Currah and Keevil get zero. Shareholders have no hope with Currah/Keevil, little with Dan and Otto but at least some hope.