Monday, December 11, 2017 5:57:14 PM
Mr Schaefer further stated to the court that "Merger Negotiations" had been ongoing since on or about May,15 2017.
And that Guard Dog (GRDO) was active and not abandoned.
Mr Schaefer stated all this to the court "Before" the motion was dismissed.
He didn't state it in a tweet, or a PR, or a filing, or a podcast.
The president and CEO of a publically held company stated it to a court.
Now, Mr Schaefer is legally bound to proceed, with the oversight of the court, because of his previous statements.
The oversight would be the court reversing it's previous decision to dismiss if Mr Schaefer doesn't make good on his statements to the court.
https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/57b27a25-b17a-4654-9c8d-45e59530d6ba
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM