Monday, December 11, 2017 10:56:57 AM
About the only difference is that under Scott the company filed financial disclosures.
Not that they were accurate or anything but they did put them out.
Other than that both management teams have done nothing for the shareholders.
Dan got rid of Scotts team. Yeah but big deal. It's kinda like having a guy pull a gun out in a bank and shoot the guy robbing the bank.
All good until after the robber dies the guy with the gun just steps up to the teller and robs the bank himself.
It would be great if you could point out how much better off the shareholders are since the change, but just changing the name of the guy ripping you off isn't any sort of improvement. Scott, Ron, Drew, Dan...what's it matter when you are just a victim?
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM