InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 1333
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/01/2013

Re: None

Sunday, 12/03/2017 9:04:55 PM

Sunday, December 03, 2017 9:04:55 PM

Post# of 52851
Compared the last SEC filings from BTZO and GERS. Both have about the same number in liabilities. BTZO has/had $18,121,312 GERS has/had $20m342,880.

One of the things I was trying to find was both companies NOL's. Some publicly traded companies will report how much money has been spent to date which, if the company ever generates revenue above and beyond liabilities, they get to use the NOL's for tax breaks.

KK can do whatever he wants and from what I've seen, has done so. But I wondered why have BTZO borrow the money instead of GERS as both companies have many similarities such as revenue and liabilities?

This got me to thinking that by combining it was all about the potential of a settlement and tax breaks, or at least, paying off the liabilities.

I myself will not invest in BTZO but I think that unless something has changed that no one but KK is aware of, BTZO shareholders will probably reap a reward on their stock price. I hope they do. But for sure, GERS shareholders will get a bump in stock price is something good comes out of the appeal process.

Also, as to BTZO, the price has not performed as if the investing world has great hopes. Sure, the volume has increased dramatically since only a few months ago but the price is in the hole. Maybe a rabbit hole.

Whatever, at least it is interesting to watch the whole process unfold. For investors in both companies, maybe we'll all get some crumbs if there is positive news.