Hi - don't mind me, but allow me to provide a few cents worth of opinion:
I know you may fundamentally disagree with this, but it's typically ludicrous to think that you've got the market beat, or to think that you know better than everyone else. While that goes for anyone, this behavior, when unfounded, is typically seen in retail investors more frequently than institutions. Over time, it's a great way to lose money.
If you think you have the market beat, then you should be able to answer this question: What's your edge? Of course, the answer should be held closely, but it's something any active investor should ask themselves at least once each week.
In the case of Cryoport, it may not be well-covered at all -- there are now five institutions covering them. However, those aren't the people you should benchmark yourself to. Measure yourself against the other institutional analysts that provide opinion into positioning -- whether their firm should buy or sell. Unfortunately, unless you have an interest in or relationship with funds or institutions that analyze and/or are investors in Cryoport, there's really no way to know what it is that they're considering in their models. Further, aside from certain public filings, you have no idea what the firms market activity really looks like.
Unless you know much, much more than you disclose and discuss on this board, I can assure you that many of the relevant institutions know at least as much as you do. They do this for a living, have access to unfathomable amounts of data, and it's safe to assume they make use of all of it. That said, everyone's forecasts are different. The way you interpret the data on-hand is likely different than the way Fund A interprets, which is different than they ways Funds B and C interpret.
If I may, out of genuine curiosity, how long have you been a Cryoport shareholder? No worries if you don't care to disclose. I'll post later today with our most recent thoughts.
