If Congress bestows such broad powers on private entities, then it fundamentally violates Constitution against delegating executive authorities to private entities. Only executive branch agencies can have such Gov authorities limited by principles of checks and balances.
First, I must ask you...which Constitutional power are you referring to that you believe has been delegated unconstitutionally? Please note that you specifically invoked the Constitution, so I expect to see a Constitutional provision that has been violated.
And before you answer, I would like to refer you to Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments. I point to this clause only because I believe that you believe that all appointments must be made by the executive branch, which is untrue.
Also, before you answer, I will preempt your claim that the nondelegation doctrine has been violated. The nondelegation doctrine specifically prevents Congress from delegating LEGISLATIVE duties. It does not mention Congress delegating EXECUTIVE duties. The logic behind this is clear...if the executive branch has a problem with a duty being delegated, it can complain or sue, or ignore the order all together and wait to be sued by Congress. But noone can sue Congress for delegating its own duties unless the Constitution prevents it...which it does.
So I repeat my question to you...which Constitutional provision do you believe was violated?
This goes against many constitutional principles like required minimum congressional delegational guidelines and congress can not delegate its legislative responsibilities.
Exactly what legislative responsibility has been delegated. Congress passed HERA which was legislation that outlined the Conservatorship. If you believe that Congress's legislative responsibilities require them to oversee day-to-day operations, then you are wrong.
