Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:40:07 AM
IMO even that wouldn't be proof. I know there are a lot of indicators saying a Settlement is coming. Like changes at websites and removing links to infringing technology by other companies. Also the text used in the previous status reports, indicated a settlement is/was close.
But are all just indications, which made me think another stay might not happen. That's what my gut feeling said.
But public proof would only be a when a company, or an attorney or judge states that the settlement is done, and there will be no further stay.
But I haven't seen such proof. And I know you think that it proofs the opposite that there isn't any volume. "No volume = No settlement for now" in your opinion. You might be right, but also about that I must say, it isn't factual proof. It might be some sort of circumstantial evidence, but if somebody says to me "I got proof", I need evidence
But are all just indications, which made me think another stay might not happen. That's what my gut feeling said.
But public proof would only be a when a company, or an attorney or judge states that the settlement is done, and there will be no further stay.
But I haven't seen such proof. And I know you think that it proofs the opposite that there isn't any volume. "No volume = No settlement for now" in your opinion. You might be right, but also about that I must say, it isn't factual proof. It might be some sort of circumstantial evidence, but if somebody says to me "I got proof", I need evidence
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
