InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,718.57
(
0.28%
)
US TECH 100
19,312.80
(
0.08%
)
Dow Jones
42,124.65
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
74.13
(
0.54%
)
Bitcoin
63,135.24
(
-0.30%
)
Post# of 104561
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Kurt_Banoffee

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 6
Posts 4500
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/16/2017

Kurt_Banoffee

Re: SUNYN75 post# 61735

Tuesday, 11/21/2017 2:41:02 PM

Tuesday, November 21, 2017 2:41:02 PM

Post# of 104561
I agree, and that's exactly my point. You appear to be saying that Samsung is moving in the other direction - from Cd-free to Cd-safe.

On the other board, you wrote "“Cd-safe means contains <100 ppm Cd in the component to be compatible with the RoHS regulation." means Samsung.

How else can that be interpreted but to say that Samsung is going from Cd-free to Cd-safe (i.e. some Cd)?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up