InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 4476
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/16/2017

Re: dms1 post# 61714

Tuesday, 11/21/2017 10:16:10 AM

Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:16:10 AM

Post# of 104408
"Nanoco" was me typing too fast.

That article is wrong about Hansol being the second source - at least in any meaningful way - maybe they sent them some early samples or something like that. It seems pretty clear that Hansol was the original (and as far as I can tell, the only) source:

Nanoco (yes, Nanoco) mentions Hansol as Samsung's manufacturing partner in this 2015 ROHS response: http://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/fileadmin/user_upload/RoHS_Pack_10/Cd_QD_Exs_Nanoco_Response_to_RoHS_Questions_27_Oct_2015.pdf

Here is a February 2015 article saying Samsung developed the technology and Hansol was making it. http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/english/news/ict/9097-quantum-dot-displays-chemical-companies-and-material-manufacturers-focusing-quantum

This 2015 article talks about how Samsung picked Hansol over Dow with no mention of Nanosys: http://www.pressreader.com/korea-republic/the-korea-times/20150403/281835757209322

Nanosys didn't have commercial Cd-free capability in 2015. As far as I can tell they may only have commercial capability just now with their [Cd-safe] Hyperion product.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.