Read an article recently that companies are allowing their securities to be revoked so they are only responsible for filing the prior 2 years of filings once they do reinstate. With all of the UMS back and forth are they aren't they...this would probably benefit iTALK.
It could also mean absolutely nothing.
I find it strange the filing by Cameron McCord of the docs for FX1 in Georgia. Then the amendment in October and the involvement of Lee as a minority holder. In addition to the fact that FX1 is in the same building that iTALK once occupied in GA.
Also, iTALK leasing is still active in GA.
Will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
If anyone says they have an investment philosophy, remind them that a monkey picked a winning portfolio over a fund manager...then fling your poop at them.