InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 1410
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2015

Re: SC777 post# 5985

Monday, 11/20/2017 5:34:35 PM

Monday, November 20, 2017 5:34:35 PM

Post# of 19267
Bringing 100 shares short does make the Price go down but in the end the Judge cant coult on ludicrouse Warant price to evaluate the Value of an Out come of the BK Company as the Allied Nevada.The Suit is pretty clear in it self and the case is pretty much very earth based and backed up with facts and INFO from the past but the everyday trading too.How are they the ANV BOD try to legitimise the tradint of the warrants when they never gave a green light to the Trading os such Warrants on the open?Wasnt the Company suposed to have it private their stock?So why in the mean while is the Warrant being traded without the Consent or Request of the BOD to the SE to monito the trading which is and will remain ilegal?Of course there is nothing to suport the theory of the value of the Warrant based on an Ilegal Trade of those Warrants.Even the market is very shadow one and not a controlled one so if any normal and healthy reason Judge should just make s simple question-Where is this Warrant being traded and who ordered such a trading?If those answers are in front of him no one would give credibility to such VALUE or PRICE otherway around they could be seen as a tool to robe for the second time the ANV SHareholders of even that poor value agreed after fight to them from the same folks whoch robed them firstly.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HYMC News