Saturday, November 18, 2017 11:46:07 AM
This shouldn't require so many notes and read-backs. My guess would be they have some wannabe engineer on the jury that lives in mommy's basement and is liking the attention and wants to stretch this out.
Once again, only requires a preponderance of the evidence. More likely than not. 51% likely. It appears one or more might be getting in the weeds and trying to prove infringement to an unwarranted degree. It doesn't require beyond a reasonable doubt. This should be a slam dunk to find more likely than not for infringement and it shouldn't take this long to determine damages.
It is "better" if the jury decides, but don't forget each side has their JMOL motions in. I believe that motion hearing is on November 27th. Judge Freeman has seen many hours of Finjan v. Blue Coat evidence through the years and I believe she would grant a Judgment as a Matter of Law (directed verdict). The only problem with that is it is unlikely she would find for willful infringement on her own. We need the jury to recommend willful infringement and then the judge will maybe concur. The jury is not the final word as most think. A judge likes to let the decision of a "reasonable" jury stand, but always has the right to completely ignore their decisions and rule totally base on the JMOL motions.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM