Friday, November 17, 2017 10:20:41 PM
For example in lending arrangements, if a note is defaulted and the creditor sells the a defaulted note at less than note amount, the purchaser is not precluded from suing for the full amount, merely because the event of default has devalued the debtors likelihood of paying anymore than this net sweep business. The net worth sweep can be waived / changed by the fhfa at any time and like the making of this bogus third amendments BS could be altered at any time.
What you have here is that the net worth swipe is only done, if "declared" by the entity. If its not declared its not owed. Since the net worth concept is cummulative, if not declared and paid in one quarter it could be the next. Alternatively, it could be suspended or replaced.
Shareholders should absolutely, have the ability to sue to adhere to the contractual promises embodied in the commons share rights.
What the governement continues to do is a total farce.
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM