Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act and Regulation 13D thereunder require beneficial owners of more than 5% of a class of equity securities of a publicly traded company to file a report with the SEC. ... Schedule 13D must be filed within 10 days of crossing the 5% ownership threshold. (fact)
Short daily volume yesterday was over 50% (fact), , therefore subtract that number of shares out of your theory (on a daily basis, fact). No, the PPS is merely what the market thinks of this stock, which isn't much unfortunately. Oh and to dispel any further myths I have ulterior motives, I wouldn't be upset if the stock went to $10, $100, or $1000 PPS.
For years, you've said the controller was selling shares to keep the price down, on Yahoo board and up until now here....through dark pools.....now you say the controller is accumulating 10% to 15% of the company, to keep the share price down (go back to the first fact in this message). Heck, just the other day you said the controller was getting spanked. You spew out of the both sides of your mouth, I guess thinking you'll be right sooner or later, and in all your controller rantings you avoid facts at all costs. BTW, what you claim they are doing is illegal stock price manipulation. Your beloved twins are much too smart, much too forthcoming to perpetrate such an act...so you see your own claims are counter intuitive to your script. They cannot be "good guys" on one end, all the while knowing "the controller" is either pursuing a licensing deal and manipulating the stock (they would know as they have a list of shareholders), or they are being manipulated by dark pools which would make them unwitting buffoons to the cloak and dagger treachery. Which is it Allo, buffoonery or active participation in stock price manipulation, because that is what you are saying.
