InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2553
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2009

Re: AlphaInvestor8 post# 28649

Friday, 11/17/2017 4:02:12 PM

Friday, November 17, 2017 4:02:12 PM

Post# of 46698
You said


AlphaInvestor8 Thursday, 11/16/17 01:52:15 PM
Re: madprophet post# 28581
Post #
28583
of 28649 Go
cool please show me a quote where it says they will sell marimed for

the 2.5 mil in deferred expenses
and all the other costs I have mentioned


So I showed you the quote. and you replied with



AlphaInvestor8 Thursday, 11/16/17 02:28:44 PM
Re: madprophet post# 28589
Post #
28592
of 28649 Go
LMAO! what page is that on? I search the whole document for marimed and there is no such comment in the filings sir

hahahha - please tell me which page of the 10q that quote is on ok?


Again you sated the quote was in the 10-Q

Not I. My first message in regards to this said in the PR and the 10-Q. My reply


madprophet Thursday, 11/16/17 02:51:45 PM
Re: AlphaInvestor8 post# 28594
Post #
28597
of 28649 Go
DO I really need to?
The company just said they sold some MRMD shares,
that they plan to continue to fund operations by selling as needed.
Already done some, have 5 million more shares still.
So since you are stuck on 2.5 million in accrued expenses,
the MRMD stock left is worth more than 2.5 million.
I understand it doesn't fit with dilution is required,
But the 10-Q didn't specifically spell it out


Again right here I state it is not in the 10-Q, the 10-Q does not spell it out. You didn't ask , Hey where did that quote come from,I would like to know, you came back with ridicule. You come back with


AlphaInvestor8 Thursday, 11/16/17 02:55:02 PM
Re: madprophet post# 28597
Post #
28598
of 28649 Go
so i am asking you to show the quote in the 10Q on what page where the company says its selling marimed

i have stated 3 times now it IS NOT IN THE 10Q

yet you say 'do i have to show you something' that if not in the 10Q , you made up LOL

wow


This all started because you saw what you wanted to see, jumped on what you thought was an opportunity. When the origination of the whole conversation clearly stated IN the PR and 10-Q. Links had already been provided for the PR so I didn't repost, I assumed you at least read the PR, and it was clear as day spelled out in the very first paragraph. I don't make up facts to fit or support my argument. I don't need to.

Connect the dots is a simple game.