Friday, November 10, 2017 12:21:49 PM
I get the impression you are not very familiar with the 351k process. It's not like 505j or 505b2 where a simple PK can act as a bridging study. Let me just say, it's much much more complicated.
I think part of the problem may be that SPPI themselves do not understand the complexity. The patent dance needed to allow biggy-backing existing GCSF data is a labyrinth and SPPI (especially their CMC group) has absolutely no bandwidth to support this. It's like little Timmy dreaming about going to the moon with his toy Saturn rocket..
Recent SPPI News
- Form 15-12G - Securities registration termination [Section 12(g)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/09/2023 10:00:17 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/28/2023 04:15:27 AM
- Form S-8 POS - Securities to be offered to employees in employee benefit plans, post-effective amendments • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/26/2023 09:23:08 PM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM